14.06.2013 Views

ISMSC 2007 - Università degli Studi di Pavia

ISMSC 2007 - Università degli Studi di Pavia

ISMSC 2007 - Università degli Studi di Pavia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PSB 89<br />

Direct C-C coupling of 1,2,4-Triazin-5(2H)-ones with Benzoannelated Crown<br />

Ethers in the Synthesis of Amino Acid's Receptors.<br />

Nadezhda A. Itsikson , Mikhail I. Kodess , Anatoly I. Matern b , Yuri Yu. Morzherin b Oleg N.<br />

Chupakhin a<br />

a I. Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis of RAS, S.Kovalevskaya/Akademicheskaya, 22/20,<br />

620219, Ekaterinburg,<br />

b Urals State Technical University, Chemical Technology Faculty, Mira, 28, 620002,<br />

Ekaterinburg, Russia<br />

Molecular recognition of bipolar organic molecules such as amino acids is a rapidly growing<br />

area of research due to their potential application as sensors for monitoring of biological<br />

systems and as selective extractants.<br />

A convenient method for one-step mo<strong>di</strong>fication of hetarenes by <strong>di</strong>fferent macrocyclic compound<br />

based on the methodology of nucleophilic ad<strong>di</strong>tion to unsubstituted carbon atom in azines has<br />

been elaborated.1-3<br />

For example reaction of benzocrown ether 1 with 3-Ph-1,2,4-triazin-5(2H)-one 2 results in the<br />

coupling of two <strong>di</strong>fferent complexating centres in the one molecule, so can be effectively applied<br />

for design of hetero<strong>di</strong>topic receptors.<br />

The complexating properties of obtained compounds toward amino acids have been stu<strong>di</strong>ed by<br />

used various methods. The results of extraction of amino acids by obtained compounds are<br />

shown in the figure<br />

3<br />

This work was financially supported by the grants Russian Foundation of Basic Researches 05-<br />

03-32094, 05-03-32085.<br />

[1] V.N. Charushin, O.N. Chupakhin. Pure and Applied Chem., 2004, 9, 1621.<br />

[2] G.L. Rusinov, D.G. Beresnev, N.A. Itsikson, and O.N. Chupakhin, Heterocycles, 2001, 2349.<br />

[3] D.G. Beresnev, N. A. Itsikson, O.N. Chupakhin, V.N. Charushin, M.I. Kodess, A.I. Butakov,<br />

G.L. Rusinov, Yu.Yu. Morzherin, A.I. Konovalov, and I.S. Antipin, J.Org.Chem., 2006; 71, 21,<br />

8272.<br />

PSB 90<br />

Synthesis, Spectroscopic, Potentiometric <strong>Stu<strong>di</strong></strong>es and Molecular Modeling<br />

of a New Biomemitic Siderophore Analogue<br />

Suban K. Sahoo, Minati Baral and B. K. Kanungo<br />

Department of Chemistry, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering & Technology, Longowal<br />

148106, In<strong>di</strong>a<br />

Siderophores are low molecular weight molecules produced by bacteria and fungi for iron<br />

uptake, which contain either hydroxamate or catechol bin<strong>di</strong>ng units and the complexes have six<br />

oxygens in an octahedral sphere about the Fe(III). Among all siderophores, the catechol based<br />

enterobactin is known to form very strong chelate with highest formation constant and its<br />

efficiency as Fe(III) ion scavenger and carrier has stimulated the synthesis of many analogues<br />

containing three catechol units in tripod with respect to their use in iron overload treatment and<br />

to elucidate biological process [1]. Keeping these facts in view, two novel enterobactin<br />

analogues: cis,cis-1,3,5-tris[(2,3-<strong>di</strong>hydroxybenzylidene)aminomethyl]cyclohexane (L 1 ) and<br />

cis,cis-1,3,5-tris[(2,3-<strong>di</strong>hydroxybenzyl amine) aminomethyl]cyclohexane (L 2 ) (Figure 1)<br />

containing one catechol unit in each arm of a tripodal amine, cis,cis-1,3,5tris(aminomethyl)cyclohexane<br />

have been investigated as a chelators for iron(III) through pH<br />

potentiometric and spectrophotometric methods in an aqueous me<strong>di</strong>um of 0.1N ionic strength<br />

and 298 K.<br />

HO<br />

OH<br />

N<br />

H<br />

H<br />

N<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

N<br />

HO<br />

HO<br />

OH H<br />

N<br />

NH<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

N<br />

H<br />

HO<br />

L HO<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

1 L2 HO<br />

N<br />

O<br />

OH<br />

N<br />

Fe<br />

O<br />

HO<br />

N<br />

O<br />

HO<br />

N<br />

H<br />

O<br />

O<br />

N<br />

H<br />

O<br />

Fe<br />

O<br />

N<br />

H<br />

O<br />

O<br />

FeL1 FeL2 Figure 1. L 1 , L 2 , FeL 1 and FeL 2 .<br />

Both the ligands form monomeric complexes of the types FeLH3, FeLH2, FeLH and FeL. Ligand<br />

L 2 (log KML = 27.1) forms stable complex as compared to L 1 (log KML = 20.4). The step-wise<br />

formation of complexes was explained through the results obtained from potentiometric titration<br />

and spectrophotometric measurements, and using molecular modeling calculations. Ligand L 1<br />

showed the potential to coor<strong>di</strong>nate iron(III) through imine nitrogens and catecholic oxygens at<br />

ortho to form a tris(iminophenolate) type complex whereas L 2 formed a tris(catecholate) type<br />

complex (Figure 1). Molecular modeling calculations suggested that, ligand L 1 undergoes ringflipping<br />

from most stable equatorial conformation to axial conformation during complexation<br />

whereas no such conformational changes were depicted in L 2 .<br />

[1] J. Neilands, J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 270, 26723.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!