19.06.2013 Views

Untitled - Shattering Denial

Untitled - Shattering Denial

Untitled - Shattering Denial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER VIII<br />

THEOLOGIANS, CANONISTS, AND CASUISTS OF THE IN<br />

QUISITION<br />

THE gravity of the crime of heresy was early recognized<br />

in the Church. Gratian discussed this question in a<br />

special chapter of his Decretum. 1 Innocent III, Guala<br />

the Dominican, and the Emperor Frederic II, as we have<br />

seen, looked upon heresy as treason against Almighty<br />

God,<br />

i.e. the most dreadful of crimes.<br />

The theologians and even the civil authorities did not<br />

concern themselves much with the evil effects of heresy<br />

upon the social order, but viewed it rather as an offense<br />

made no distinction between<br />

against God. Thus they<br />

those teachings which entailed injury on the family and<br />

on society, and those which merely denied certain re<br />

vealed truths. Innocent III, in his constitution of Sep<br />

tember 23, 1207, legislated particularly against the<br />

Patarins, but he took care to point out that no heretic,<br />

no matter what the nature of his error might be, should<br />

be allowed to escape the full penalty of the law. 2 Fred-<br />

1 Causa xxxi, q. vii, cap. 16.<br />

2 &quot;Servanda in perpetuum lege sancimus ut quicumque hcereticus, maxime<br />

Paterenus . . . protinus capiatur et tradatur secular! curiae puniendus secundum<br />

legitimas sanctiones,&quot; etc. Ep. x, 130.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!