29.06.2013 Views

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pg. 116 Joe King<br />

<strong>Helen</strong> <strong>Sommers</strong>, who served 36 years in the House,<br />

chairing five committees including the House Appropriations<br />

committee for 12 years.)<br />

Speaker Joe King: <strong>Helen</strong> describes herself as a<br />

policy wonk, and becoming Appropriations Chair<br />

was her chance to drive policy at a level she was<br />

comfortable with. She made an incredible impact<br />

on the state for years to come. When I think back<br />

on those times, <strong>Helen</strong> was one of the key leaders in<br />

the House that Democrats, as well as Republicans,<br />

really admired. She was a strong leader who was<br />

respected by both sides of the aisle. With <strong>Helen</strong>’s<br />

help, particularly her ability to reach across the aisle,<br />

throughout my 12 years, we accomplished major,<br />

significant improvements to state government.<br />

With <strong>Helen</strong>, as I said before, she was very much<br />

a social liberal, but fiscally, she was conservative.<br />

She marched to her own strong fiscal tune. She<br />

just thought we ought to govern responsibly, and<br />

if there were momentarily political pressures to<br />

bend in one direction, <strong>Helen</strong> just didn’t bend that<br />

way. A lot of us would do that, but not <strong>Helen</strong>. She<br />

just didn’t bow to political pressure!<br />

Sometimes it was very hard for her to acknowledge<br />

political realities. I remember on more than one<br />

occasion telling her, “<strong>Helen</strong>, we just don’t have the<br />

votes to do this! We’re not going to get the support<br />

for that.” That kind of thinking was hard for <strong>Helen</strong>.<br />

What I remember most about <strong>Helen</strong>, was how<br />

she was able to gain influence by working with<br />

newer members of the Legislature coming in. She’d<br />

reach out to them and help them learn the process.<br />

She had been a House member for 10 years when<br />

many of us came on in the early 1980s. She was fond<br />

of legislators who were, like <strong>Helen</strong>, pretty fiscally<br />

conservative, but socially quite liberal. She just had<br />

an eye for developing those kinds of relationships<br />

with new members.<br />

When I first came to the House, I was pretty<br />

green. I don’t know how I identified myself at that<br />

time as far as being a ‘moderate’ Democrat. One<br />

area <strong>Helen</strong> would cultivate me on is pension issues.<br />

I thought we needed to be careful in doling-out<br />

pensions, and making sure we funded them. That<br />

was also a prime crusade for <strong>Helen</strong> throughout<br />

her career, making sure our pensions were fiscally<br />

conservative, so I’d say on that kind of issue I, too,<br />

was fiscally conservative.<br />

I remember, as a freshman, I once made a comment<br />

in Caucus on my concerns on the pension<br />

system. <strong>Helen</strong> followed me out of the room and<br />

said to me, “I’m glad to hear you say that. I have a<br />

pension issue I’m working on and I can certainly<br />

use your help on it.” I can’t remember if she wanted<br />

me to sign on the bill, but she had some role in her<br />

mind that I could play on the pension issue. I think<br />

she did that for two reasons: she may have actually<br />

needed a little help on the measure, but much more<br />

likely, she wanted to reach out and befriend a new<br />

freshman legislator, and to build a bond. We did<br />

have that bond.<br />

<strong>Helen</strong> really understood how budgets were connected,<br />

and she was always very clear about her<br />

priorities, and higher education was high on her list.<br />

Higher education is one of the most vulnerable parts<br />

of the state budget. It’s not constitutionally mandated;<br />

and it’s not caseload driven like social services<br />

programs. She really knew if you have unchecked<br />

spending in one area, it would negatively filter down<br />

and eventually impact the Higher Ed. budget. So, if<br />

she was working to hold down pensions, or she was<br />

working not to increase health care case loads, she<br />

knew that any extra spending in those areas, would<br />

come at the expense of higher education.<br />

She wasn’t being tough just for the sake of being<br />

tough. She just kept her eye on the whole picture.<br />

<strong>Helen</strong> could be a very intimidating force. Lots<br />

of people were intimidated by <strong>Helen</strong>, and there<br />

were a lot of freshmen who would tippy-toe around<br />

when they needed something in Appropriations.<br />

She’d be very direct.<br />

One of the best anecdotes about <strong>Helen</strong> comes<br />

from Rep. Jeff Gombosky. It was during the<br />

Nisqually Earthquake in 2001. <strong>Helen</strong>, Jeff, Bill<br />

Grant, Eileen Cody, Lynn Kessler and others were<br />

in a meeting with Speaker Chopp in his office.<br />

During the conversation, someone had opined that<br />

higher education was going to have to take a hit in<br />

the budget. At that very moment, the earthquake<br />

hit and walls started shaking, and some in the office<br />

started to panic. The Speaker said, “Come on,<br />

follow me; let’s get out of here!” Bill Grant was in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!