29.06.2013 Views

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Leonard Sawyer elected Speaker of the House<br />

to be vice-chair of the House Revenue Committee.<br />

Wasn’t that unusual in those days for a freshman?<br />

<strong>Helen</strong> <strong>Sommers</strong> was named vice-chair<br />

of the Revenue Committee in her first term<br />

Representative <strong>Sommers</strong>: That was an exception. It<br />

was a decision by Speaker Sawyer to name me vicechair<br />

as a freshman. Rep . Bob Randall, who was<br />

an optometrist, was the new chair of the Revenue<br />

Committee. Randall didn’t have much background<br />

in that area, so that was one of the reasons, probably<br />

along with my masters degree in Economics,<br />

I was named the vice-chair.<br />

I think it was also because Sawyer and Randall<br />

knew I had a background with<br />

the League of Women Voters,<br />

and one of the things at that<br />

time the League worked on<br />

was our tax system. I had given<br />

talks in the League of Women<br />

Voters on enacting a state<br />

income tax. They took some<br />

Rep. Robert Randall<br />

(Editor’s note: Rep. Robert<br />

Randall, an Optometrist,<br />

(D-23 rd Dist.) served in the<br />

House from 1969-1977.<br />

Randall died on<br />

Oct. 15, 2007).<br />

positions on these things and,<br />

as the League president, I gave<br />

speeches to community meetings,<br />

so I had a background<br />

in revenue issues. That’s what<br />

got me interested to run for<br />

the Legislature in the first<br />

place. The League was supporting an income tax<br />

rather than the state’s regressive sales tax. But, that’s<br />

all ancient history now.<br />

Monahan: I read in the book, “Speaker of he<br />

House: the Political Career and Times of John L.<br />

O’Brien” (by Daniel Jack Chasan), where O’Brien<br />

makes the comment, that “Sawyer was a ‘master<br />

pg. 25<br />

politician’ but was not a very good presiding officer”<br />

and that’s when the task of presiding fell on<br />

O’Brien. I’ve noticed, too, over the years including<br />

now where the Speaker very rarely presides during<br />

session. Usually, the Speaker Pro Tempore is the<br />

presiding officer of the House. <strong>An</strong>d, he – in this<br />

case, O’Brien – gets into a mode where they can<br />

move things pretty quickly. But then the Speaker<br />

might take over when it’s a more urgent kind of<br />

issue before the House.<br />

Representative <strong>Sommers</strong>: I don’t think Leonard<br />

Sawyer liked to preside. It’s<br />

a huge use of the Speaker’s<br />

time and efforts. Sawyer recognized<br />

that O’Brien really<br />

liked to preside and was proud<br />

of being the presiding officer.<br />

Sawyer knew he was not a<br />

particularly good presiding<br />

officer, he turned that duty<br />

over to O’Brien. I guess this<br />

Speaker of the House: The<br />

Political Career and Times<br />

of John L. O’Brien by<br />

Daniel Jack Chasan<br />

(Sep 1990)<br />

change in pattern recognizes<br />

that the Speaker has a lot of<br />

other things to do, and presiding<br />

is a time-consuming task.<br />

He might preside from time<br />

to time but the presiding was a huge demand on<br />

time. That continued throughout the time. When<br />

Frank Chopp was House Speaker (2002 to present),<br />

Speakers Pro Tempores John Lovick and Jeff Morris<br />

were the presiding officers.<br />

Monahan: Would the Speaker, for example, use<br />

that time when you’re debating issues and so on,<br />

to engage in his caucus maybe, I would say, a little<br />

arm twisting or at least encourage votes?<br />

Representative <strong>Sommers</strong>: Oh, yes! One of the<br />

Speaker’s primary jobs is to try to keep his caucus<br />

together on major issues. In Sawyer’s case, he was<br />

a Speaker who would twist arms on many of the<br />

big issues. Sawyer had a good grasp of government<br />

and knew how government should be run and that<br />

you needed the legislative branch.<br />

Monahan: But, while he presided very infrequently,<br />

Sawyer’s focus was on increasing and advancing<br />

the role of the Legislature. Is that a fair statement?<br />

Representative <strong>Sommers</strong>: Yes. There were things

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!