Helen Sommers: An Oral History
Helen Sommers: An Oral History
Helen Sommers: An Oral History
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Press<br />
53 lawmakers in the delegation, only 17 are women.<br />
Yet five of those - Rep. Lorraine Hine, D-Des<br />
Moines, Murray, Cantwell, Rep . <strong>Helen</strong> <strong>Sommers</strong>,<br />
D-Seattle, and Brough - are among the top 10.<br />
One former lobbyist, a woman, said some of the<br />
best people in the Legislature are women because<br />
their skills have been undervalued in the marketplace.<br />
“In King County, most good, qualified men have<br />
jobs that pay well enough that they can’t afford to<br />
go down to the Legislature,’’ the former lobbyist<br />
said. “With women, that hasn’t happened yet.’’<br />
Hine and <strong>Sommers</strong>, both political veterans, have<br />
shown different ways how to crack the remnants<br />
of Olympia’s old-boys club.<br />
Hine, the former mayor of Des Moines, has<br />
been in the Legislature since 1980, but her stock<br />
has risen fastest in the past two years. Increasingly,<br />
said one observer, Hine has learned to listen to all<br />
sides of an issue and has emerged as somebody<br />
likely to propose a compromise solution. As caucus<br />
chair, she is part of House Speaker Joe King’s<br />
leadership corps.<br />
<strong>Sommers</strong>, chairwoman of the House Capital<br />
Facilities and Financing Committee, has made her<br />
mark in policy rather than politics. She’s not the negotiator<br />
or political strategist that Hine is, but she is<br />
considered one of the delegation’s smartest members.<br />
She has become an expert in the capital construction<br />
budget, an area many lawmakers find<br />
repulsively dull, too complicated or both. At the<br />
same time, she is subject to a complaint often heard<br />
about Seattle’s lawmakers: Politicians, staffers and<br />
lobbyists find her aloof and difficult to deal with,<br />
and as a result she is not as effective as she might be.<br />
One of the survey’s more interesting perceptions<br />
is of Sen. Frank Warnke, D-Auburn.<br />
Warnke, a lawmaker since 1965, is an old-style<br />
politician who likes to cut deals in a back room<br />
and who is famous for remembering and returning<br />
favors. It’s a style that has made him one of the<br />
delegation’s more effective members, and his No.<br />
18 ranking reflects respect among insiders.<br />
But several respondents said Warnke also can<br />
use his power to undercut those whom he deems<br />
pg. 301<br />
disloyal, especially those who welsh on a favor. As<br />
caucus chairman for the Senate Democrats, for<br />
example, he has been known to prevent an errant<br />
colleague’s bill from getting a timely vote, or to<br />
keep somebody’s pet pork-barrel line item out of<br />
the capital construction budget.<br />
Increasingly, Warnke’s style is fading in favor<br />
of a more open, understated approach.<br />
With the strong showing by Cantwell, Sprenkle<br />
and <strong>Sommers</strong> - not to mention the detail-loving<br />
budget writers Locke and McDonald - a case could<br />
be made for the rise of the technocrat.<br />
In each instance, the lawmakers have found success<br />
not by trading favors over a late-night scotch<br />
but by putting forth thoughtful policy proposals.<br />
Add to that a warm personal style, and you have<br />
someone insiders believe could be a rising star in<br />
the 1990s - Patty Murray.<br />
“I think the worst legislators are people who<br />
don’t have good people skills,’’ a state bureaucrat<br />
said. “The system depends on people skills - on<br />
being able to communicate with your caucus and<br />
with the people across the aisle.’’<br />
That’s part of the explanation for the high marks<br />
given to Murray’s first-year performance.<br />
One business lobbyist said Murray set the<br />
standard against which all first-term lawmakers<br />
should be compared. She worked very hard early in<br />
the session last year making contacts, studying the<br />
backgrounds of several issues and learning about<br />
the Capitol’s political workings.<br />
In the waning days of the session, she wasn’t<br />
afraid to use what she’d learned. The most frequently<br />
cited example is her decision - against the advice of<br />
some of those in her caucus - to fight powerful special<br />
interests on a family-leave bill. Murray, despite<br />
long odds against success, insisted the legislation<br />
be extended to include leave from work for people<br />
who have a family member with a terminal illness.<br />
To almost everybody’s surprise, she won.<br />
“Man, I was impressed,’’ a second lobbyist said<br />
of Murray. “She wants to change the world, and<br />
she makes you believe there’s a good chance she<br />
can do it.’’