29.06.2013 Views

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Press<br />

Gardner and Rep. Gary Locke, D-Seattle. But<br />

despite his rhetoric, McDonald hasn’t successfully<br />

used the budget or the bully pulpit it provides to<br />

lead the charge for real changes in the welfare<br />

system he berates.<br />

REP. GARY LOCKE<br />

The House Appropriations chairman, who lives<br />

and breathes the legislative life, has an unsurpassed<br />

knowledge of the state’s finances that makes him a<br />

tough negotiator. Locke has become the champion<br />

of social services, protecting those programs and<br />

presiding over the expansion of services like mental<br />

health. But he is seen by some as a technocrat, and<br />

he alienated many of his colleagues by keeping<br />

them in the dark about the budget.<br />

REP. DENNIS BRADDOCK<br />

Democratic chairman of the House Health<br />

Care Committee, Braddock, of Bellingham, isn’t<br />

one of the biggest names in the Legislature. But<br />

he’s often cited, even by Republican opponents,<br />

as a true leader: He has a big-picture view of the<br />

state’s health-care system and a plan to get there.<br />

The secret, he says, is that he’s not afraid to be<br />

unpopular, or even unelected.<br />

Copyright (c) 1991 Seattle Times Company, All<br />

Rights Reserved.<br />

The Best & The Rest – The Insiders<br />

Rate Seattle-Area Legislators – Political<br />

Pundits Say Smarts, Congeniality<br />

Beget Power These Days At<br />

The Capitol<br />

By Mark Matassa, Jim Simon<br />

Sunday, January 7, 1990<br />

OLYMPIA - On paper, they’re equals - 147 men<br />

and women who each have a single vote on the laws<br />

and policies of the state of Washington.<br />

However, voting is only the final and formal<br />

stage of the lawmaking process. <strong>An</strong>d in the ability<br />

to get their pet proposals to that stage, Washington’s<br />

legislators are anything but equal.<br />

pg. 299<br />

There is, in fact, a colossal range in the abilities<br />

and effectiveness of individual lawmakers. As the<br />

Legislature prepared for the 60-day session that<br />

begins tomorrow, The Seattle Times set out to<br />

measure that range.<br />

The Times surveyed more than 30 Olympia<br />

insiders - mostly lobbyists, government staff people<br />

and elected officials, of various political stripes -<br />

on the quality of the 53 legislators from the Seattle<br />

area, including King, northern Pierce and south<br />

Snohomish counties.<br />

Predictably, two widely acknowledged powerbrokers<br />

- House Appropriations Chairman Gary<br />

Locke and Senate Ways and Means Chairman Dan<br />

McDonald - finished at or near the top.<br />

But other findings were more surprising. Most<br />

notably, the survey suggests that the traditional<br />

political equation - longevity equals power - no<br />

longer holds true in Olympia. Consider:<br />

- A first-term senator, Democrat Patty Murray,<br />

finished in the top five. Freshmen are generally<br />

presumed to wield little influence, but the energetic<br />

Murray, who represents northwest Seattle and the<br />

adjoining suburbs, made a big impression in her<br />

first year.<br />

- Two other relative newcomers from the north,<br />

Reps. Maria Cantwell of Mountlake Terrace and Art<br />

Sprenkle of Snohomish, both Democrats, were judged<br />

highly, having combined studious work habits and<br />

political smarts to rise quickly through the ranks.<br />

- Two Democratic fixtures - Sen. Al Williams<br />

and Rep. John O’Brien, both of Seattle - were raked<br />

by survey respondents as lazy and ineffectual. Between<br />

them, Williams and O’Brien have nearly 70<br />

years of legislative service.<br />

The survey is not a formal, scientific poll. Instead,<br />

it is a reflection of thinking among those who watch<br />

how public policy - and reputations - get made on<br />

a daily basis. Those perceptions can differ greatly<br />

from the election-time view of voters back home.<br />

Respondents were asked to rate the lawmakers in<br />

several categories - intellect and savvy, energy, effectiveness<br />

and their relative standing in the Legislature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!