29.06.2013 Views

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

Helen Sommers: An Oral History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pg. 130 Jim Boldt<br />

<strong>An</strong>d, if she wasn’t, she would tell you. If she hated<br />

your idea, she’d let you know, and you’d have to<br />

get ready for a good fight. <strong>Helen</strong> and I had a lot<br />

of similar philosophical views, but, because I was<br />

from eastern Washington and she was from Seattle,<br />

frankly she didn’t always support my personal<br />

choices. There were times that we argued to the<br />

point that we’d just pick a different issue to continue<br />

with. But we were friends early on and I respected<br />

her more than anyone else. I was 24 and she was<br />

10 to 15 years older than me. I had a lot to learn,<br />

and she was there for that.<br />

When I first came to the House, there were<br />

a couple of freshmen on Ways and Means Committee.<br />

John McKibbin and I were the only<br />

two freshmen who got the nod. So that put us<br />

working on appropriations issues and working<br />

with <strong>Helen</strong> right away. The other thing is, I had<br />

a strong Latino population in Benton County<br />

and I, frankly, was not as sensitive to immigrant<br />

issues as I should have been. Well, <strong>Helen</strong> had<br />

lived and worked in Venezuela, she was fluent in<br />

Spanish, and she was knowledgeable about the<br />

Latino issues. I was on the Education Committee<br />

and <strong>Helen</strong> guided me through the state’s first<br />

bi-lingual bill that I sponsored. She was, and<br />

still is a good friend! We socialized together at<br />

political functions, and we kind of hung around<br />

together in those years.<br />

The Democrats had only been in the majority<br />

for two years when I came to the House in 1975.<br />

In the ’73 session we had a 57-41 majority. The Republicans<br />

had been in the majority the previous six<br />

years. In 1973, when the Democrats were in charge,<br />

Rep. Leonard Sawyer was elected Speaker of the<br />

House. In the 1975 session, after I was elected, we<br />

had a 62-36 majority! <strong>An</strong>d, there were a lot of new,<br />

young legislators who came to ‘change the world!’<br />

Now, Leonard Sawyer was a brilliant man and<br />

he was a strong Speaker of the House. I respect him<br />

for what he did to give the Legislature a greater<br />

role in state government. He probably, single handedly,<br />

is the person that made the Washington State<br />

legislative branch an equal partner in governance.<br />

When Lenny became Speaker, he wanted to establish<br />

the Legislature as a more equal branch of government.<br />

For the first time, the Legislature brought<br />

on year-around professional staff. We incorporated<br />

some of the Boeing software information into our<br />

budgeting process.<br />

Before that, Governor Evans would throw a<br />

budget on the table that his office had devised and<br />

the House and Senate would all scramble around<br />

and see if our districts were taken care of, and vote<br />

yes or no!<br />

The House and Senate actually became a participant<br />

in the fiscal aspect of state government<br />

with the arrival of Len Sawyer and the Office of<br />

Program Research, which he established. He also<br />

tried to implement almost a full-time Legislature<br />

with his ‘continuing session.’ We would only recess;<br />

we would not adjourn. In 1975 I think we went clear<br />

until September in a rolling recess.<br />

But there was a group of us newer members<br />

who felt we should have more involvement in the<br />

process; more to say. Our major objection was that<br />

Sawyer just closed us out of the process. We were<br />

considered the ‘back-benchers.’ That drew most of<br />

the younger and newer members together. There were<br />

some people there philosophically involved, but for<br />

me, it was process. That culminated in discussions<br />

of what we felt was the inappropriate direction the<br />

caucus was headed as far as total governance under<br />

Leonard Sawyer. A handful of members started<br />

late in the spring of 1975 to actually lay the now<br />

historical process in place for Leonard’s resignation<br />

and replacement!<br />

During the 1975 session, <strong>Helen</strong> was chair of the<br />

State Government Committee, the first committee<br />

she chaired. She also worked closely with Rep.<br />

“Bud” Shinpoch, essentially as Bud’s ‘aide-de-camp’<br />

on the Appropriations side because of her revenue<br />

interests. She had her fingerprint on a lot of the<br />

fiscal issues early on.<br />

I think there were about seven of us who started<br />

this Speaker of the House thing! Rick Bender and<br />

I were roommates; Art Clemente, Chuck Moon,<br />

Marion Kyle Sherman, Donn Charnley. That was<br />

the core group. It was a secret core group during<br />

the discussions. <strong>Helen</strong> did bring balance to some of<br />

our fervor attitudes when she joined our effort later<br />

on. She was a good person to help us do the right<br />

thing. <strong>Helen</strong> respected Sawyer, but she understood

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!