30.06.2013 Views

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Only a limited number <strong>of</strong> arguments have been discussed about the reliability OSS and<br />

Proprietary s<strong>of</strong>tware. The debate between supporters <strong>of</strong> OSS and Proprietary s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

has been continuing <strong>for</strong> decades and there is no obvious conclusion. Testing the<br />

validity <strong>of</strong> disk imaging tools demands further studies, as digital <strong>for</strong>ensics is still an<br />

immature field.<br />

2.2.4 Verification And Validation Of Digital <strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Tools</strong><br />

Section 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 have discussed the legal implications <strong>of</strong> digital evidence.<br />

Digital <strong>for</strong>ensic practitioners are relying on automated s<strong>of</strong>tware tools to acquire and<br />

analyse digital evidence. The reliability <strong>of</strong> the digital evidence is determined by the<br />

completeness and accuracy <strong>of</strong> the tools employed by the <strong>for</strong>ensic investigators.<br />

Imperious demands are raised by law en<strong>for</strong>cement, the intelligence community and<br />

other government agencies to verify and validate the validity <strong>of</strong> digital <strong>for</strong>ensic tools.<br />

Rogers & Seigfried (2004) and Etter (2001) have pointed out that <strong>for</strong>ensics tool testing<br />

or validation is one <strong>of</strong> the challenges or issues in <strong>for</strong>ensic science research. The<br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> Daubert guidelines also indicates that the <strong>for</strong>ensics tool must be validated<br />

if they produce evidence that is introduced to court.<br />

2.2.4.1 Background <strong>of</strong> Verification and Validation (V&V)<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware Verification and Validation (V&V) concept emerged in late 1960‟s. V&V is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the disciplines in s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering that embeds the quality assurance<br />

process throughout the lifecycle <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware development. V&V examines and<br />

analyses whether the functions <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>tware are working correctly and running as<br />

expected (Wallace& Fujii, 1989). Many models and standards have been developed<br />

over the years such as IEEE S<strong>of</strong>tware V&V standard 1012-2004, 1059 and 1074. The<br />

standard outlines the plan, process and documentation requirements <strong>of</strong> V&V (Rohilla<br />

& Malik, 2008). According to the IEEE (1990) Standard Glossary <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

Engineering Terminology, Validation is defined as “The process <strong>of</strong> evaluating a<br />

system or component during or at the end <strong>of</strong> the development process to determine<br />

whether it satisfies specified requirements” (p. 80).<br />

In other words, the developed s<strong>of</strong>tware should satisfy the pre-determined<br />

requirements. With regarding to the digital <strong>for</strong>ensic tools, it confirms whether the<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!