30.06.2013 Views

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

Evaluating A Selection of Tools for Extraction of Forensic Data: Disk ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esulting acceptance spectrum can be divided into four levels, namely exceeds<br />

requirements, target range, minimally acceptable and unacceptable, according to ISO<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware evaluation standard 14598.1-2000. Tests will be executed and checked<br />

against requirements defined in stage 1. Test results are collected and assessed against<br />

the acceptance spectrum defined in stage 4. The complete evaluation result is released<br />

to the community <strong>for</strong> review in stage 6.<br />

The framework developed by Wilsdon & Slay (2006) is a refined approach <strong>of</strong><br />

NIST and SWDGE. Development <strong>of</strong> an organised reference set <strong>of</strong> different functions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tested s<strong>of</strong>tware can make the testing in the proposed research more efficient.<br />

Because multiple test subjects will frequently access different test cases <strong>for</strong> the same<br />

function, unified reference sets will save time <strong>for</strong> retrieving the same data again and<br />

again.<br />

3.1.4 Applying Systematic Method For Commercial Off-the-shelf (COTS)<br />

<strong>Selection</strong><br />

Kontio (1996) presented a case study applying a systematic method <strong>for</strong> reusable COTS<br />

selection. The aim <strong>of</strong> the study is to prove that a more thorough definition <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation criteria will result in a more effective and reliable evaluation process<br />

(Kontio, 1996). A methodology called Off-The-Shelf Option (OTSO) has developed to<br />

assist the process <strong>of</strong> search, evaluation and selection <strong>of</strong> COTS <strong>for</strong> decision makers.<br />

The paper has placed the focus on how to define evaluation criteria and analyse data.<br />

In addition, two data analysis methods, weighted scoring method (WSM) and Analytic<br />

Hierarchy Process (AHP), were applied in the case study and compared and analysed<br />

against various standards such as efficiency. The process <strong>of</strong> OTSO method is<br />

illustrated in Figure 3.4, which demonstrates how the research was done. Evaluation<br />

criteria definition is gathered from five different resources, requirement specification,<br />

design specification, project plan, organisational characteristics and criteria feedback<br />

from the process <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware searching. Then from the selection criteria a set <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

evaluation criteria is <strong>for</strong>med and these criteria will assist the s<strong>of</strong>tware screening<br />

process to narrow down the candidate s<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>for</strong> in-depth evaluation.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!