An Investigation of the Impact of Signal Strength on Wi-Fi Link ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(P-1.5m)O-P 22.90 -83 123 0.714 NLOS P 24.19 -80 51 1.721 NLOS (P-1.5m)P-Q 23.48 -82 68.2 1.287 NLOS (P-2.5m)P-Q 23.05 -81 66.8 1.314 NLOS (P-3.5m)P-Q 22.66 -80 55.3 1.587 NLOS Q 21.84 -84 44.8 1.959 NLOS (R-4.5m)Q-R 21.48 -76 34.7 2.529 NLOS (R-3.5m)Q-R 21.29 -70 23.2 3.783 NLOS (R-2.5m)Q-R 21.15 -64 15.6 5.626 NLOS (R-1.5m)Q-R 21.05 -67 17.4 5.044 NLOS 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 R 21.00 -59 16.8 5.224 LOS S 16.50 -54 13.7 6.406 LOS Table B.7: Numerical results for AP at position “H”. Access Point at position "H" : RSSI/Throughput/Distance A B C D E F G I L M J K N O P Q R S RX Position Figure B.1: Throughput/RSSI/Distance for AP at position “H”. - 128 - RSSI (dBm) Throughput (Mbps) Distance (Meter)
Figure B.2: Throughput map for AP at position “H”. 8. Access Point at Position “F” RX Position AP at F TX at F2 Position File Size: 10.9 MB Distance from AP (Meter) <strong>Signal</strong> <strong>Strength</strong> (dBm) - 129 - Time (second) Throughput (Mbps) LOS/NLOS A 12.53 -68 12.9 6.803 NLOS (A-1.5m)A-B 11.88 -73 19.3 4.547 NLOS (A-2.5m)A-B 11.54 -74 20.4 4.302 NLOS B 11.00 -66 14.3 6.137 NLOS (C-3m)B-C 11.40 -69 15.6 5.626 NLOS (C-2m)B-C 11.70 -73 11.6 7.566 NLOS C 12.53 -73 20 4.388 NLOS (C-2m)C-D 10.82 -67 13 6.751 NLOS (C-3m)C-D 10.00 -64 11.2 7.836 NLOS D 7.81 -66 10.5 8.359 NLOS (E-3m)D-E 6.71 -62 10.8 8.126 NLOS (E-2m)D-E 6.32 -60 11.5 7.632 NLOS
Page 1 and 2:
An Investi
Page 3 and 4:
2.3.5 Signal <stro
Page 5 and 6:
Attestation of Aut
Page 7 and 8:
Abstract Wireless local area networ
Page 9 and 10:
List of Abbreviati
Page 11 and 12:
List of Figures Fi
Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables Tab
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 Introduction There has be
Page 17 and 18:
WLAN performance evaluation and ana
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2 Background and Related Wo
Page 21 and 22:
The IEEE 802.11 networks have two o
Page 23 and 24:
The coverage of a
Page 25 and 26:
2.2.1 Physical Layer Figure 2.8 sho
Page 27 and 28:
throughput significantly at higher
Page 29 and 30:
DCF is designed to provide “best-
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2.11: Backof</strong
Page 33 and 34:
modulation in [37]. According to si
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.12: Net throughput <strong
Page 37 and 38:
As highlighted in [46, 47], distanc
Page 39 and 40:
2.3.2 Base Station Placement <stron
Page 41 and 42:
gained an insight that this would m
Page 43 and 44:
proposed to improve WLAN performanc
Page 45 and 46:
specifications of
Page 47 and 48:
dynamic and complicated. As argued
Page 49 and 50:
In addition, we surveyed and review
Page 51 and 52:
4.1 Performance Metrics A stopwatch
Page 53 and 54:
Model: DWL-G132 Specification: Sta
Page 55 and 56:
Figure 4.1: WY building layout. - 4
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 4.2 shows wireless configura
Page 59 and 60:
4.4.2 Wireless Adapter Configuratio
Page 61 and 62:
4.4.3 AP Operation Mode Two APs (D-
Page 63 and 64:
meeting room with different distanc
Page 65 and 66:
Scenario 4 In figure 4.12, two APs
Page 67 and 68:
“(H-3.5m)F-H” is the</s
Page 69 and 70:
Figure 4.16: Phase 2 measurement: A
Page 71 and 72:
performed the prop
Page 73 and 74:
The receiver sensitivity is an impo
Page 75 and 76:
In table 5.1, the
Page 77 and 78:
Ethernet connectio
Page 79 and 80:
sufficient signal coverage and thro
Page 81 and 82:
throughput decreases along with low
Page 83 and 84:
In table 5.1, when RSS is larger th
Page 85 and 86:
(for example, measurement point “
Page 87 and 88:
AP at Position “R” Figure 5.13
Page 89 and 90:
The measurement results indicated t
Page 91 and 92: 5.2.2 Throughput An</strong
Page 93 and 94: impact on RSS and throughput. Resul
Page 95 and 96: The throughput of
Page 97 and 98: The RSS of “WDS
Page 99 and 100: The average throughput of</
Page 101 and 102: The average data size of</s
Page 103 and 104: 5.6.1 SOHO Environment Due to <stro
Page 105 and 106: The following notes are needed to b
Page 107 and 108: when APs were placed at positions
Page 109 and 110: Real and accurate results for AP pl
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 7 Summary and Conclusions W
Page 113 and 114: planning. Propagation measurement (
Page 115 and 116: deployment. Many WLANs are deployed
Page 117 and 118: placement in indoor wireless system
Page 119 and 120: Communications, vol. 2, no. 5, pp.
Page 121 and 122: [56] J. K. L. Wong, M. J. Neve, and
Page 123 and 124: eceived signal strength of<
Page 125 and 126: Appendix A Preliminary Experimental
Page 127 and 128: 2. AP Mode Measurement in t
Page 129 and 130: 7. The Ad-Hoc Mode Measurement on <
Page 131 and 132: Appendix B Phase 1 Experimental Res
Page 133 and 134: (P-1.5m)O-P 32.78 -86 193.6 0.453 N
Page 135 and 136: 3. Access Point at Position “E-3M
Page 137 and 138: (C-5m)C-D 21.63 -83 46.8 1.875 NLOS
Page 139 and 140: J 9.00 -44 8.2 10.703 LOS (J-1.5m)J
Page 141: 7. Access Point at Position “H”
Page 145 and 146: 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 Acc
Page 147 and 148: (N-3m)N-O 15.00 -72 15.6 5.626 NLOS
Page 149 and 150: (C-3m)C-D 14.32 -74 13.6 6.453 NLOS
Page 151 and 152: Figure B.8: Throughput map for AP a
Page 153 and 154: 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 Acc
Page 155 and 156: AP at A RX Position Left-Hand Area
Page 157 and 158: AP at L RX Position Left-Hand Area
Page 159 and 160: Appendix D Phase 3 Experimental Res
Page 161 and 162: TX at 2M from E-3M Data File: 153.6
Page 163 and 164: IEEE 802.11 b/g Access Point DWL-21
Page 165 and 166: Standards • IEEE 802.11g • IEEE
Page 167 and 168: 1 Maximum wireless signal rate deri
Page 169 and 170: Wireless 108G Standards • 802.11b
Page 171 and 172: Wireless 108G Add 802.11g Wireless
Page 173: 2.4GHz Omni-Directional 7dBi Indoor
show all

An Investigation of the Impact of Signal Strength on Wi-Fi Link ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?