An Investigation of the Impact of Signal Strength on Wi-Fi Link ...
An Investigation of the Impact of Signal Strength on Wi-Fi Link ...
An Investigation of the Impact of Signal Strength on Wi-Fi Link ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AP at Positi<strong>on</strong> “E-3M”<br />
<strong>Fi</strong>gure 5.9 shows <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> measurement results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> distance, RSS and throughput when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> AP<br />
was located at positi<strong>on</strong> “E-3M”. <strong>Wi</strong>th different AP locati<strong>on</strong>s, RSS and throughput may<br />
also change at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same time. For example, RSS <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> measurement point “(C-2m)C-D”<br />
was -63 dBm with a throughput <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.325 Mbps when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> AP was located at positi<strong>on</strong><br />
“E-3M” (refer table B.3). In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> previous scenario (AP at positi<strong>on</strong> “G”) at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same<br />
measurement point “(C-2m)C-D”, RSS was -70 dBm with a throughput <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7.566 Mbps<br />
(refer table B.2). The results revealed that positi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> AP has an important impact <strong>on</strong><br />
RSS and throughput.<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
-20<br />
-40<br />
-60<br />
-80<br />
-100<br />
Access Point at positi<strong>on</strong> "E-3m" : Distance/RSSI/Throughput<br />
A B C D E F G H I L M J K N O P Q R S<br />
RX Positi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Fi</strong>gure 5.9: Distance/RSSI/Throughput for AP at positi<strong>on</strong> “E-3M”.<br />
- 70 -<br />
RSSI (dBm)<br />
Throughput (Mbps)<br />
Distance (meter)<br />
<strong>Fi</strong>gure 5.10 shows throughput map <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> AP when it was placed at positi<strong>on</strong> “E-3M”.<br />
The throughput was adequate <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “left-hand side” and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> center <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice.<br />
However, throughput is still quite low in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> corner <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “right-hand side” <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice