MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 Chapter 4<br />
dependence of R 2 is so small (less than 10% variation) it has not been<br />
measured.<br />
The range of validity can be extended to about 200K for La0.67Ca0.33MnO3 and 350K for La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 with the addition of a T n term where 4 < n < 5.<br />
The data was analyzed with a fit to R 0 + R 2 T 2 + R 4.5 (H)T 4.5 since a T 4.5<br />
temperature dependence has been predicted for electron-magnon scattering in<br />
the double exchange theory [112]. Evidence for a T 4.5 term (as opposed to T 4 or<br />
T 5 ) cannot be claimed from this data, only that it allows the determination of<br />
the R 0 and R 2 terms to higher accuracy in a much larger temperature range.<br />
The maximum temperature for which the data were analyzed was<br />
determined by finding the maximum temperature where the free parameters<br />
remained stable and the fit was visibly accurate.<br />
The results of this analysis are given in Table 2. As expected, R 4.5 (H)<br />
decreases as the magnetic field increases. In a field of 70 kOe, R 4.5 (H) decreases<br />
by 25-50% (Table 2).<br />
Recently other authors have analyzed the resistivity data for<br />
RE 0.67 AE 0.33 MnO 3 compounds using models different than the one presented<br />
above. The resistivity of polycrystalline La 0.67 Ca 0.33 MnO 3 has been fit to R 0 +<br />
R c T c [29] while a polynomial fit such as the one used in this work will also fit<br />
their data. The R 0 + R 2 T 2 + R 4.5 T 4.5 fit, which has the same number of free<br />
parameters, is preferable since there seems to be some universality in R 2 . The<br />
low temperature zero field resistivity of La 0.67 Ba 0.33 MnO 3 films [109] has been<br />
fit to R 0 + R 1 T + R 2 T 2 , where R 1 < 0. R 1 may not have physical meaning even<br />
though a small correction is necessary to explain the almost constant<br />
resistivity at the lowest temperatures. A dominant T 2 term has been also<br />
recently found in the resistivity of single crystals [113].