05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Electronic and Magnetic Measurements 35<br />

polaron formation are more physically plausible and therefore the adiabatic<br />

analysis is preferred.<br />

3.1.3.2.3 Diffusive Conductivity<br />

The same form of the conductivity derived for adiabatic small polaron<br />

hopping is found more generally for diffusion limited conduction. If the<br />

charge carrier must overcome an activation energy, E A , to hop to a<br />

neighboring site, the probability for hopping will be proportional to<br />

exp(-E A /k B T). From the theory of the random walk, the diffusion constant D<br />

can be estimated using this hopping probability, the frequency, ω, with which<br />

an attempt to hop is made (usually the frequency of the optical phonon which<br />

provides the lowest barrier to hopping at some instant), and the site to site<br />

distance, a: D = λωa 2 exp(-E A /k B T). λ is a geometrical factor approximately<br />

equal to 1. The mobility is related to the diffusivity via the Nernst-Einstein<br />

relation μ = eD/k B T. Thus the conductivity, σ = neμ, of a general, activated,<br />

diffusive process is σ = ne 2 ωa 2 /k B T -1 exp(-E A /k B T). The transport of ions in a<br />

crystal is diffusive, and therefore the ionic conductivity is often analyzed<br />

assuming this form of the conductivity [66]. The transport of small polarons<br />

is very similar and has also been described in this way [67-69].<br />

3.1.3.2.4 Variable range Hopping<br />

For a semiconductor or insulator at low enough temperatures, the<br />

predominant conduction mechanism may no longer be by excitation of<br />

carriers to the mobility edge or by thermally activated hopping to the nearest<br />

neighbor but by variable range hopping. At low temperatures, the<br />

mechanism with the lowest barrier energy will dominate. Due to any<br />

randomness in the sample, the hopping site with the lowest barrier energy<br />

will not in general be the nearest neighbor. The increased hopping distance<br />

will of course reduce the probability that the carrier will tunnel to this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!