MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34 Chapter 3<br />
The dichotomy between the two types of polarons seems unnecessary<br />
when considering their spatial extent, but the conductivity of the two types of<br />
polarons are vastly different. Large polarons move with significant mobilities<br />
μ > 1 cm 2 /V sec, that decrease with increasing temperature (metal-like). In<br />
contrast, small polarons move with very low mobilities, μ Θ D /2) the electrical<br />
conductivity is predicted [58] to be σ = 3ne 2 ωa 2 /2k B T -1 exp(-E A /k B T). Here n is<br />
the number density of charge carriers, a is the site-to-site hopping distance, ω<br />
is the longitudinal optical phonon frequency and e is the electronic charge.<br />
The Hall mobility may behave like the drift mobility with 1/3 of the<br />
activation energy, but in the adiabatic approximation the form is much more<br />
complicated [58].<br />
In the theory of small polaron hopping, it was found that the motion of<br />
the polaron is only weakly dependent on the magnetic order, and changes<br />
little as the temperature is raised above the Curie temperature [61, 62].<br />
Small polarons were first studied in the non-adiabatic regime, where the<br />
electron transfer integral and hence the bandwidth is small [60, 63-65]. In the<br />
high temperature limit this gives a factor of T 3/2 instead of a T in the drift and<br />
Hall mobilities. There are some unphysical assumptions required for the<br />
non-adiabatic analysis to be valid. The assumptions behind the adiabatic