05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 Chapter 3<br />

The dichotomy between the two types of polarons seems unnecessary<br />

when considering their spatial extent, but the conductivity of the two types of<br />

polarons are vastly different. Large polarons move with significant mobilities<br />

μ > 1 cm 2 /V sec, that decrease with increasing temperature (metal-like). In<br />

contrast, small polarons move with very low mobilities, μ Θ D /2) the electrical<br />

conductivity is predicted [58] to be σ = 3ne 2 ωa 2 /2k B T -1 exp(-E A /k B T). Here n is<br />

the number density of charge carriers, a is the site-to-site hopping distance, ω<br />

is the longitudinal optical phonon frequency and e is the electronic charge.<br />

The Hall mobility may behave like the drift mobility with 1/3 of the<br />

activation energy, but in the adiabatic approximation the form is much more<br />

complicated [58].<br />

In the theory of small polaron hopping, it was found that the motion of<br />

the polaron is only weakly dependent on the magnetic order, and changes<br />

little as the temperature is raised above the Curie temperature [61, 62].<br />

Small polarons were first studied in the non-adiabatic regime, where the<br />

electron transfer integral and hence the bandwidth is small [60, 63-65]. In the<br />

high temperature limit this gives a factor of T 3/2 instead of a T in the drift and<br />

Hall mobilities. There are some unphysical assumptions required for the<br />

non-adiabatic analysis to be valid. The assumptions behind the adiabatic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!