05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Local Structure and Magnetism in Gd 0.67 Ca 0.33 MnO 3<br />

that expected from the trend found in the manganese ferromagnetic ordering<br />

temperature as a function of the average of the R and A atom sizes in<br />

R 1-x A x MnO 3 [100], it is assumed for now that the Mn-Mn interaction in<br />

Gd 0.67 Ca 0.33 MnO 3 is ferromagnetic. The ferrimagnetism must then arise from<br />

a weaker, antiferromagnetic Mn-Gd interaction. Thus, unlike the ferrites,<br />

where the dominant interaction is antiferromagnetic between the two<br />

transition metal sublattices, the strongest magnetic coupling in<br />

Gd 0.67 Ca 0.33 MnO 3 is ferromagnetic, much like that found in the rare earth<br />

cobaltites, e. g. GdCo 5 [142].<br />

The above description of the magnetization can be bolstered using a<br />

simple molecular or mean field model described in section 3.2.2.4. Assuming<br />

that all atoms on each sublattice (Mn or Gd) feel the same mean field, there<br />

are only two unknown mean field coefficients due to the Mn-Mn and Mn-Gd<br />

interactions. These two coefficients are easily determined since they are<br />

nearly proportional to T C and T Comp , respectively. This molecular field model<br />

(Figure 5-5) reproduces the qualitative features described above.<br />

The calculated magnetization and inverse susceptibility for the molecular<br />

field model described below is shown in Figure 5-5.<br />

This model is limited by the obvious simplifications: not only are there<br />

two distinct types of Mn atoms (Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ ), but there are numerous<br />

possible configurations for the number and type of near neighbors due to the<br />

randomness on the Mn and Gd/Ca sites. The discrepancy among the various<br />

values of T C determined by the three methods mentioned is an example of<br />

non-mean-field ferromagnetic behavior. The discrepancies in the salient<br />

features discussed above may result from the simplifications of the model,<br />

and the assumptions behind it.<br />

5. 1. 5. 2 Canted antiferromagnetism<br />

The evidence concerning the magnetic structure of the manganese in the<br />

ferromagnetic insulator phase points to a canted antiferromagnetic structure<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!