05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120 Chapter 6<br />

resistivity ρ ∝ M 2 [113, 155, 156] (which is isotropic) with limited experimental<br />

verification.<br />

6. 2. 1 General Model<br />

The difference above and below T C as well as the relationship to the<br />

magnetization M can be shown more generally by only considering the<br />

symmetry of the resistivity tensor - with no assumptions about or even a<br />

reference to microscopic transport mechanisms. Following Landau and<br />

Lifshitz [157], the relation between the electric field E and the current density J<br />

is given by the resistivity tensor ρ: E i = ρ ik J k where the components of ρ are<br />

functions of H and M. Since H and M are vectors which are antisymmetric<br />

under time reversal, ρ must have the following symmetry: ρ ik (H,M) =<br />

ρ ki (-H,M) = ρ ki (H,-M) = ρ ik (-H,-M). The symmetric, s ik , and antisymmetric, a ik ,<br />

parts of ρ ik = s ik + a ik then have the following properties: s ik (H,M) = s ik (-H,M) =<br />

s ik (H,-M) and a ik (H,M) = -a ik (-H,M) = -a ik (H,-M). Thus the components of s ik are<br />

even functions of H and M while those of a ik are odd functions.<br />

The measured resistivity ρ, the diagonal component of the resistivity<br />

tensor, contains no contribution from a ik and therefore must be even in H and<br />

M. Assuming the resistivity is an analytic function with respect to H and M<br />

(which themselves may not be analytic in T), the first terms in the expansion<br />

of ρ in powers of H and M is then ρ = ρ 0 + αM 2 + βH 2 + γH•M. At this point,<br />

one can already expect that for T > T C (M=0) the low field magnetoresistance<br />

should be proportional to H 2 while for T < T C (M≠0) the term linear in H may<br />

be expected to dominate. Clearly a negative magnetoresistance can not obey<br />

this relation for arbitrarily large H, for the resistivity would eventually<br />

become negative; higher order terms or inverse powers of H are then<br />

required. The above argument is as valid for the conductivity tensor σ, where<br />

J i = σ ik E k , as it is for ρ. In the case of the manganites, the magnetoconductivity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!