05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 Chapter 3<br />

3.2.2.1.2 Conduction electron diamagnetism<br />

The motion of conduction electrons in a metal or semiconductor will also<br />

provide a diamagnetic response (Landau diamagnetism) to a magnetic field.<br />

This is difficult to calculate but generally of the same order as the Pauli<br />

paramagnetism (section 3.2.2.1.3). A superconductor, however, expels a<br />

magnetic field completely (Meissner effect) by the motion of the<br />

superconducting electrons. The diamagnetism of a superconductor is,<br />

therefore, very large, χ vol = -1/4π emu/cc G in the Meissner regime. Since<br />

superconductivity is affected by temperature and a magnetic field, the<br />

magnetic response of a superconductor is actually quite complicated.<br />

3.2.2.1.3 Pauli paramagnetism<br />

Electrons in a metal can be partitioned into spin-up and spin-down bands,<br />

parallel and antiparallel to an applied magnetic field H. The magnetic field<br />

will lower the energy of the spin-up band compared to the spin-down band<br />

(by 2μ B H) and spin-down electrons will flip their spins and pour over into the<br />

spin-up band. The number of electrons (per volume) that need to flip their<br />

spins is approximately the density of electronic states, n(E F ) times one half of<br />

the energy splitting. This produces a net magnetization proportional to the<br />

2<br />

magnetic field and therefore a positive susceptibility, χvol = μB n(EF ). A more<br />

sophisticated statistical-mechanical derivation produces the same result with<br />

small correction proportional to T 2 . The Pauli susceptibility of a metal should<br />

thus be nearly temperature independent and about the same magnitude as<br />

the Larmor diamagnetism. Since the contribution of the Landau<br />

diamagnetism is not known, it is usually not possible to get more than an<br />

order-of-magnitude estimate of the Pauli susceptibility from magnetization<br />

measurements. In principle, however, the Pauli susceptibility should be a<br />

measure of the bare density of electronic states at the Fermi level, n(E F ), in the<br />

absence of many body effects. The linear electronic specific heat term

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!