05.07.2013 Views

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

MAGNETISM ELECTRON TRANSPORT MAGNETORESISTIVE LANTHANUM CALCIUM MANGANITE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 Chapter 4<br />

magnetoresistance observed in the temperature range used to fit the<br />

conductivity data is absorbed primarily in the T 4.5 term. This universality<br />

with respect to growth, composition, and magnetic field leads us to conclude<br />

that the T 2 term in the resistivity represents intrinsic behavior of<br />

La 0.67 AE 0.33 MnO 3 compounds.<br />

Resistivity (10 -3 Ω cm)<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

La 0.67 (Sr/Ca) 0.33 MnO 3 Low Temperature Resistivity<br />

LSM Film<br />

LCM Film<br />

0.1<br />

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

(T/T )<br />

C<br />

0.4 0.5<br />

2<br />

Figure 4-8 Low temperature resistivity (in zero field) of<br />

La 0.67 (Sr/Ca) 0.33 MnO 3 films (LSM1 and LCM10). Solid lines are<br />

the fit to R 0 + R 2 T 2 + R 4.5 T 4.5 up to 250K and 200K for LSM and<br />

LCM respectively. The dashed lines show the constant and T 2<br />

terms of the best fit.<br />

Significant T 2 dependencies in resistivity [117] are often observed in<br />

metallic ferromagnets such as Fe, Co, and Ni where the coefficient [118] is 10 -11<br />

Ωcm/K 2 . The magnitude of R 2 is expected [84, 119] to scale with 1/M 0 , which<br />

explains the larger 5 x 10 -8 Ωcm/K 2 value for R 2 found in the weak itinerant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!