16.07.2013 Views

Full Journal - Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology - Haliç Üniversitesi

Full Journal - Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology - Haliç Üniversitesi

Full Journal - Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology - Haliç Üniversitesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pad3 locus from the Col-pad3 mutant to investigate<br />

whether PAD3 is involved in defence responses<br />

mediated by the RPP1 or RPP13 resistance genes.<br />

Material <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

Isolates <strong>of</strong> P. parasitica<br />

All isolates <strong>of</strong> P. parasitica known to be recognised<br />

by RPP1 <strong>and</strong> RPP13 genes in accession Nd-1 were<br />

used. These isolates are Emco5, waco5, Maks9,<br />

Aswa1, Goco1, Edco1, Emoy2 <strong>and</strong> Hiks1.<br />

Interaction phenotypes<br />

The seeds were sown according to Holub et al.<br />

(1994). The seedlings were inoculated as described by<br />

Holub et al. (1994). Seven days old seedlings were<br />

inoculated with appropriate isolate <strong>of</strong> P. parasitica<br />

<strong>and</strong> incubated in a growth room. The interaction<br />

phenotypes were recorded at 3 <strong>and</strong> 7 days after<br />

inoculation (dai) according to host response <strong>and</strong><br />

pathogen sporulation. Pitting necrosis on the<br />

cotyledon was recorded as "P" <strong>and</strong> this was always<br />

associated with no pathogen sporulation, thus it was<br />

abbreviated as "PN". Clorotic flecks (abbreviated as<br />

F) were also seen on the host, but sporulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pathogen may occur although very low. In A.<br />

thaliana-P. parasitica research, pathogen growth was<br />

almost always scaled into five categories according to<br />

pathogen sporulation in each cotyledon (Holub et al.,<br />

1994; Tör et al., 1994; Botella et al., 1998; Bittner-<br />

Eddy et al., 1999). These categories are abbreviated to<br />

letters as follows: "N" is for none sporulation, "R" is<br />

for rare (less than 1 conidiophore for per cotyledon),<br />

"L" is for low sporulation (1-5 conidiophores per<br />

cotyledon), "M" is for medium sporulation (5-20<br />

conidiophores per cotyledon) <strong>and</strong> "H" is for heavy<br />

sporulation (more than 20 conidiophores per<br />

cotyledon).<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> genotypes carrying the RPP1, RPP13<br />

<strong>and</strong> pad3 loci<br />

The Col-pad3 mutant <strong>and</strong> the accession Nd-1 plants<br />

were grown to flowering <strong>and</strong> cross-pollination was<br />

processed. F1 was back-crossed to parent Nd-1 to<br />

obtain more Nd-1 effect. F1 seeds were grown for F2<br />

seeds. All selections were made from these F2 families.<br />

Camalexin <strong>and</strong> RPP1 <strong>and</strong> RPP13 resistance genes 95<br />

The Col-pad3 mutant does not accumulate<br />

camalexin following induction by P. parasitica or<br />

abiotic inducer AgNO3 (Mert-Türk et al., 1998;<br />

Mert-Türk, 2001; Mert-Türk et al., manuscript in<br />

preparation). Therefore, the marker for the allele <strong>of</strong><br />

pad3 would be the phenotype that does not<br />

accumulate camalexin. Camalexin extraction <strong>and</strong><br />

Thin Layer Chromotography (TLC) were carried out<br />

as described by Glazebrook <strong>and</strong> Ausubel (1994). F2<br />

genotypes were first screened for camalexin<br />

deficiency. The genotypes that did not accumulate<br />

camalexin were labelled that they carried the pad3<br />

allele. Then these genotypes were tested whether they<br />

carry RPP1 <strong>and</strong> RPP13 genes as well. As the map<br />

position <strong>and</strong> primers near to the RPP1 <strong>and</strong> RPP13<br />

genes are known all selection process were made<br />

using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).<br />

DNA isolation<br />

PhyoPure Plant DNA Extraction Kit (Nucleon<br />

Biosciences, UK) was used for DNA isolation. Leaf<br />

samples were harvested <strong>and</strong> freeze-dried at-60°C for<br />

2 days 0.02 g dried tissue was added to a milling tube<br />

containing two ball bearings <strong>and</strong> milled for 10 min.<br />

The powder was transferred to a 1.5 ml sterile<br />

Eppendorf tube <strong>and</strong> DNA was extracted as<br />

Manufacture’s advice.<br />

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)<br />

The amplification reaction were carried out in a<br />

thermocycler. Two specific primers, one from each<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the DNA fragment to be amplified, were used<br />

for selective amplification. The primers<br />

encompassing the RPP1 <strong>and</strong> RPP13 resistance genes<br />

are shown in Table 1.<br />

PCR reactions were carried out in 25 µl volumes<br />

that contained 2.5 µl 10X PCR buffer, 1 µl <strong>of</strong> 5 mM<br />

dNTP (equal mixture <strong>of</strong> four), 1 µl <strong>of</strong> 50 mM MgCl2,<br />

1 µl <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> 10 µM primers <strong>and</strong> 1 µl <strong>of</strong> DNA which<br />

is about 25-50 ng <strong>and</strong> 0.2 µl Taq DNA polymerase.<br />

Conditions for amplification were as follows: 1 min at<br />

95°C for 1 cycle, denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds,<br />

annealing 30 seconds at 50-58°C dependent on the<br />

primers used, <strong>and</strong> polymerisation at 72°C for 2 min.<br />

This cycle was repeated 35 times. A final cycle was 2<br />

min at 72°C for the uncompleted cycles. The<br />

reactions were stopped by chilling to 4°C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!