16.07.2013 Views

Download - Evonik Industries

Download - Evonik Industries

Download - Evonik Industries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this transition from prototype production to serial<br />

(low-volume) production. The DMRC is the result<br />

of the merging of eight companies and research<br />

institutes, and receives financial support<br />

from the government of North Rhine-Westphalia.<br />

The four founding companies—<strong>Evonik</strong>, Boeing,<br />

EOS and MTT Technologies—will invest a total of<br />

€ 2 million in the DMRC over the five-year contract<br />

period. Since the opening of the DMRC in<br />

May 2009, the participating experts have focused<br />

mainly on practical questions, such as man aging<br />

the temperature of the machines being used or<br />

the long-term properties of sintered parts.<br />

While a good, substantive idea for a new technology<br />

can come into being quite suddenly, it may<br />

still have difficulty reaching the heads of key players.<br />

This is true in the case of additive manufacturing.<br />

Many universities teach the conditions for<br />

“freedom of design” and “function-driven design“<br />

inadequately, if at all. While engineers receive intensive<br />

training in conventional processes, they<br />

usually learn very little about freedom of design,<br />

which opens the door for them to additive manufacturing.<br />

Indeed, additive manufacturing is based<br />

on the idea of fundamentally different design,<br />

since the designer must think in terms of complete<br />

functionalities and not decoupled component<br />

parts.<br />

Standards as pathbreakers<br />

Lack of training at the universities is not the only<br />

hurdle. In the past, development, modification<br />

and use of mold-free production processes was<br />

quite unsystematic. This is why there are currently<br />

no standards to promote widespread use of the<br />

process and regulate evaluation of existing products.<br />

As a result, part testing yields different values<br />

for elasticity module, tensile strength and elongation,<br />

for example, depending on the set of param<br />

eters used (Fig. 5). Both the ISO and ASTM,<br />

however, are working on developing the first<br />

standards for laser sintering. ISO 27547-1 is already<br />

in force for the production of test bodies. VDI is<br />

also drafting guidelines.<br />

Despite the hurdles and unanswered questions<br />

that still exist, the importance of AM will grow<br />

appreciably over the next ten years. The advantages<br />

outweigh these problems: developers can<br />

produce functional hollow structures in small<br />

batches, and the structures can be precisely modified<br />

to changing stress requirements. The components<br />

can be customized with specific porosities<br />

or surfaces, and ultra-lightweight components are<br />

also possible. Here, the airline industry is one of<br />

the pioneers. There are already about 30 SLSsintered<br />

components installed in the Boeing 787.<br />

elements32 evonik science newsletter<br />

D e S i G n i n G w i t H P o l Y M e r S<br />

Figure 4. Comparison of the technical properties of a part produced by<br />

laser sintering and one produced by injection molding<br />

Test method Laser sintered Injection molded<br />

test bar test bar<br />

Density g/cm³ DIN 53479 0.95 1.04<br />

E modulus MPa DIN 53457 1,700 1,400<br />

Tensile strength MPa DIN 53455 48 46<br />

Elongation % DIN 53455 18 >50<br />

Figure 5. Depending on the parameter set, tests on the same part can yield differing<br />

values and make evaluation more difficult. Standards should improve this situation<br />

Test method Parameter Parameter Parameter<br />

set 1 set 2 set 1,<br />

upright built<br />

Density g/cm³ 0.91 0.9 0.91<br />

Modulus of elasticity MPa DIN 53457 1,872 1,920 1,921<br />

Tensile strength MPa DIN 53455 49 48 49<br />

Elongation % DIN 53455 18,2 8,4 7<br />

According to estimates by Airbus <strong>Industries</strong>, an<br />

aircraft produced entirely through additive manufacturing<br />

would be 30 percent lighter and 60 percent<br />

more cost-effective than current machines.<br />

Resources and energy efficiency—combined<br />

with economical production—are the central challenges<br />

of the future for Germany, if it intends to<br />

remain competitive in a fast-changing world. In<br />

the past, it was often the work of people that think<br />

outside the box and therefore helped breathe life<br />

into a new technology. They also play a role in additive<br />

manufacturing. One thing is certain: sooner<br />

or later, additive manufacturing technologies will<br />

become key players in placing advanced industrial<br />

production on a cost- and resource-efficient footing.<br />

l<br />

SyLVIA MONSHEIMER<br />

Born in 1965<br />

Sylvia Monsheimer is responsible for<br />

global market development of additive<br />

manufacturing for evonik’s High<br />

Performance Polymers Business line.<br />

Previously, she managed the business<br />

line’s Strategic innovation Projects department.<br />

Monsheim came to evonik<br />

in 1989 after receiving her degree in<br />

construction engineering. Since then,<br />

she has held a wide variety of positions<br />

in application engineering for high performance polymers. Her<br />

more than ten­year focus on powder development and application<br />

engineering for selective laser sintering and other tool­free processes<br />

is a hallmark of her work at High Performance Polymers.<br />

+49 2365 49-5911, sylvia.monsheimer@evonik.com<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!