NEW - Ken Gilbert
NEW - Ken Gilbert
NEW - Ken Gilbert
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Do you have some near-perfect digital<br />
photographs that are marred by<br />
overexposure, underexposure, or low contrast? If<br />
you’re itching to fi x them, but reluctant to muck about<br />
with Adobe Photoshop’s Curves and other manual<br />
adjustments, Photoshop also offers some jiffy fi xes.<br />
Called Layer Blending modes, these use math to<br />
combine the pixels of one layer with the pixels of an<br />
underlying layer to create an improved image. First<br />
step: Duplicate the image layer, which stacks your<br />
picture on top of itself. Then click on the drop-down<br />
menu in the upper left corner of the Layers panel to<br />
change the blend mode from Normal<br />
to one of the following:<br />
nMultiply. This darkens images<br />
and increases highlight<br />
contrast, just what you want<br />
for an overexposed photo. It<br />
multiplies each layer’s pixel<br />
values together.<br />
nScreen. Basically the<br />
inverse of Multiply, this<br />
lightens images and increases<br />
shadow contrast, good for<br />
underexposed photos.<br />
nOverlay and Soft Light. These, in<br />
effect, multiply the shadows and screen the<br />
highlights, which increases contrast. Soft Light is a<br />
weaker version of Overlay.<br />
You control the degree of the blend effect by<br />
adjusting the opacity of the upper layer—the lower<br />
the percentage, the more transparent the layer. When<br />
you get the look you want, merge the layers and<br />
you’re done. Duplicating and blending layers takes<br />
only a few keystrokes, so it’s well worth trying for<br />
quick fi xes of your photographs. —Timothy Edberg<br />
You’ve said to use a circular polarizer<br />
to make skies bluer, reduce refl ections,<br />
etc. Aren’t all polarizers circular? And<br />
how does a linear polarizer work? —F.P.<br />
“Circular” has nothing to do with its<br />
shape—circular polarizers can also be<br />
rectangular. And linear polarizers are also<br />
made in a round, rotating fi lter mount.<br />
Both types reduce refl ections by aligning<br />
light waves in ordered ranks. A linear<br />
polarizer passes waves that are aligned in a<br />
linear fashion; think of a slotted grate.<br />
Circular polarizers work the same way,<br />
except that they add an additional layer of<br />
BLENDER RECIPES:<br />
The Multiply Blend mode<br />
in Adobe Photoshop darkens<br />
an overexposed image and<br />
improves colors (A). Screen<br />
adds snap to an underexposed<br />
frame (B). Overlay opens up<br />
shadows and enriches<br />
colors (C).<br />
90 POP PHOTO MAY 2009<br />
fi lter material, called a<br />
quarter-wave plate, that<br />
cranks the polarized light a bit<br />
off kilter. (It’s much more<br />
complicated, but believe us, you don’t want<br />
to read all about it.) “Circular polarization”<br />
was already a science term when the fi lter<br />
was invented, adding to the confusion.<br />
Circular and linear polarizers produce the<br />
same effects. But the latter can create<br />
problems with autofocusing and in-camera<br />
metering, for which DSLRs use<br />
semitransparent mirrors (also called beamsplitters).<br />
Linear polarizers tend to<br />
(surprise!) suppress refl ection in<br />
the beam-splitters.<br />
Circular polarizers’<br />
slight rescrambling<br />
of light allows the<br />
AF and metering to work normally, which is<br />
why DSLR makers recommend them.<br />
Circular polarizers are considerably more<br />
expensive—sometimes twice the price. You<br />
can economize by using a linear polarizer if<br />
you’re willing to focus manually (or<br />
manually touch up the AF) and diligently<br />
check your exposures using a histogram. p<br />
FIELD GUIDE: How can you tell linear<br />
from circular? Often by the markings. Also,<br />
a linear polarizer works the same when<br />
reversed on your lens, whereas a circular<br />
one has little or no effect when reversed.<br />
TIMOTHY EDBERG (6)