Educational Assessment and Accountability; Annual Reports ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

School Status and Improvement Report Certified Staff Teaching Staff Total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Regular Instruction, FTE Special Instruction, FTE Supplemental Instruction, FTE Teacher headcount Teachers with 5 or more years at this school Teachers' average years of experience Teachers with advanced degrees 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% Professional Teacher Credentials Facilities Fully licensed Provisional credential Emergency credential School facilities inspection results Grounds Building exterior Building interior Equipment/Furnishings Health/Safety Sanitation 90.9% 9.1% 0.0% School Year Ending 2010 Classrooms available 22 Number of classrooms short (-) or over (+) 0 Score 1 2 3 Total 15 For each category: 1 = Unacceptable; 2 = Satisfactory; 3 = Very Good For Total: 6-8 = Unacceptable; 9-15 = Satisfactory; 16-18 = Very Good 2 2 2 3 3 3 School Resources 20.0 16.0 3.0 1.0 22 7 9.7 6 20 2 0 * Students per Teaching Staff Regular Instruction Special Instruction School Year 2009-10 Administrative and Student Services Staff Administration, FTE * Librarians, FTE Counselors, FTE Number of principals at this school in the last five years 18.5 8.7 * Regular instruction includes both regular and supplemental teaching staff and does not include mainstreamed special education students. Therefore, these figures do not indicate class size. 2.0 0.5 1.0 * Administration includes Principals, Vice-Principals, Student Activity Coordinators, Student Services Coordinators, Registrars, and Athletic Directors Administration Library Caf eteria/ Auditorium Classrooms Adequacy of School's Space 83% 85% 254% 127% 0% 100% 200% School facilities are considered inadequate if below 70%; marginal if between 70% and 99%; and in excess of state standard if above 100%. School population is placed into size categories and is used in formulas to determine State standards for space. Graph does not display capacity exceeding 200%. 2 State Standard Kekaha Elementary School 11/10 Page 4 of 8
School Status and Improvement Report School Quality Survey Vital Signs School Year 2009-10 The School Quality Survey (SQS), administered periodically by the System Evaluation and Reporting Section, is used for strategic planning and to comply with state accountability requirements. * School Quality Survey Dimensions Standards-Based Learning Quality Student Support Professionalism & System Capacity Coordinated Team Work Responsiveness of the System Focused & Sustained Action Involvement Satisfaction Student Safety & Well Being 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 Percent of Positive Responses Teachers Parents Students School State School State School State 95.4% 91.2% ** ** 73.2% 94.7% 92.0% 80.4% 76.2% 73.8% 87.7% 80.0% ** ** 69.2% 77.5% 81.9% 76.4% 76.4% 63.8% 95.5% 84.8% ** ** 83.5% 90.4% 85.9% 78.8% 79.2% 86.8% 77.6% 73.7% ** ** 78.9% 69.2% 75.4% 69.2% 66.5% 77.6% 92.4% 83.3% ** 71.8% 85.0% 71.4% 70.8% 96.1% 82.3% ** ** 77.9% 85.7% 84.5% 66.5% 64.1% 84.0% 88.6% 76.6% ** ** 70.4% 67.3% 78.6% 74.0% 70.9% 66.9% 93.9% 74.4% ** ** 76.3% 79.5% 78.3% 78.4% 74.9% 70.3% 85.7% 83.7% ** ** 68.9% 90.1% 85.6% 77.4% 77.8% 63.2% ** 76.4% 76.3% 70.3% 70.3% 87.5% 87.8% 77.6% 77.9% There are no student items for this dimension 81.4% 81.4% 69.6% 69.7% 79.7% 79.6% 69.3% 69.2% *** Survey Return Rate 2009 57.9% 76.8% ** ** 93.9% 91.1% 2010 59.1% 70.1% 37.9% 37.6% 56.8% 93.0% * State Teacher and Parent positive response figures are one of 4 grade spans (Gr. K to 5/6, Gr. 6/7 to 8, Gr. 9 to 12, and Multi-level) that best correspond to this school's grade span. The Student positive response figures for the State and this school are those of the highest grade level surveyed at this school. ** The Parents survey for the school year 2008-09 was cancelled. *** State Return Rate for Teachers, Parents, and Students are for one of 6 grade spans (i.e., Gr. K to 5/6, Gr. K to 7/8, Gr. K to 12, Gr. 6/7 to 8, Gr. 6 to 12, and Gr. 9 to 12) that correspond to this school's grade span. Kekaha Elementary School 11/10 Page 5 of 8
Page 1 and 2: SUBJECT: Educational Assessment and
Page 3 and 4: School Code: Kekaha Elementary Scho
Page 5: School Status and Improvement Repor
Page 9 and 10: School Status and Improvement Repor
Page 11 and 12: School Code: Aiea Intermediate Scho
Page 19 and 20: School Code: Theodore Roosevelt Hig
Page 27 and 28: Continuous Improvement Building for
Page 29 and 30: Dear Educational Partners, Welcome
Page 31 and 32: 2009 SuperintenDent’S Annual Repo
Page 33 and 34: Resource Support Funding Support Ha
Page 35 and 36: Graduation & Dropouts Each year a c
Page 37 and 38: Our Strategic Goals 2008-2011 oUr C
Page 39 and 40: 2009 SuperintenDent’S Annual Repo
Page 41 and 42: GOAL 2: Provide Comprehensive Suppo
Page 43 and 44: 7. Increase the percent of teachers
Page 45 and 46: State Summary Background For the fo
Page 47 and 48: State Summary Progress and Outcomes
Page 49 and 50: State Summary Progress and Outcomes
Page 51 and 52: Mililani Leilehua Waialua Waianae N
Page 53 and 54: Percent of Kindergarteners Who Atte
Page 55 and 56: Change in Percent of Kindergarten T
Page 57 and 58:
Trends HCPS Reading Grades 3-8 and
Page 59 and 60:
Trends HCPS Mathematics Grades 3-8
Page 61 and 62:
Complex Summaries Assessmentmathema
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix A. GloSSary This glossary
Page 65 and 66:
Appendix A. GloSSary Norm-Reference
Page 67 and 68:
For more information and online acc
Page 69 and 70:
Data tables are available online at
show all

Educational Assessment and Accountability; Annual Reports ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?