06.08.2013 Views

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1.4: Snapshot of a sample AMC File.<br />

has an extension of an .amc and defines the actual channels of the animation. Each<br />

frame starts with a line declaring the frame number. The next line contains the data<br />

for the bone animation comprised of the bone name and the data for each channel<br />

(defined in the .asf file) of that bone. The frame sections in the file continue until the<br />

end of the file[11]. A snapshot of a small portion of AMC file is in Figure 1.4.<br />

This thesis concentrates on indexing of motion data which is one of the issues<br />

related to motion-based animation. The chapter 1 of this thesis describes motion in-<br />

dexing, motion representation, and motion file formats. The chapter 2 describes the<br />

two different PCA-based techniques for motion indexing and also explains them from<br />

an implementation point of view. The chapter 3 describes the idea and implementa-<br />

tion details of a geometric feature-based motion indexing technique. Dynamic time<br />

warping based indexing techniques are described in the chapter 4. The chapter 5 of<br />

the thesis describes the two types of performance evaluation: Time performance and<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!