A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...
A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...
A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 1.4: Snapshot of a sample AMC File.<br />
has an extension of an .amc and defines the actual channels of the animation. Each<br />
frame starts with a line declaring the frame number. The next line contains the data<br />
for the bone animation comprised of the bone name and the data for each channel<br />
(defined in the .asf file) of that bone. The frame sections in the file continue until the<br />
end of the file[11]. A snapshot of a small portion of AMC file is in Figure 1.4.<br />
This thesis concentrates on indexing of motion data which is one of the issues<br />
related to motion-based animation. The chapter 1 of this thesis describes motion in-<br />
dexing, motion representation, and motion file formats. The chapter 2 describes the<br />
two different PCA-based techniques for motion indexing and also explains them from<br />
an implementation point of view. The chapter 3 describes the idea and implementa-<br />
tion details of a geometric feature-based motion indexing technique. Dynamic time<br />
warping based indexing techniques are described in the chapter 4. The chapter 5 of<br />
the thesis describes the two types of performance evaluation: Time performance and<br />
13