06.08.2013 Views

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF MOTION INDEXING ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5<br />

EXPERIMENTS <strong>AND</strong> RESULTS<br />

We designed two experiments to evaluate the time performance and the indexing<br />

accuracy of five different algorithms for motion indexing. The first two techniques are<br />

PCA-based and rely on the preserved information ratio obtained by dimensionality<br />

reduction of data. The first technique uses only SVD and the second uses PPCA. The<br />

third technique is based on the geometric feature functions which use joint positions<br />

of the body as parameters. The fourth and fifth techniques are based on Dynamic<br />

Time Warping and use a local distance as a metric for indexing. The first DTW-based<br />

method, DTW-Quat, uses quaternion-based distance measure and the second DTW-<br />

based method, DTW-3D, uses 3-D point clouds to calculate the distance measure.<br />

These experiments are performed using the motion capture files from CMU Graphics<br />

Lab Motion Capture database.<br />

5.1 Performance Testing<br />

The time performance evaluation is performed by running the five methods on<br />

a set of 10 files where each file is compared with itself and the other files. A total of<br />

100 matches are performed by each method. These 10 motion files are of sizes ranging<br />

from 199 frames to 5,423 frames. The set of motion files used for performance testing<br />

can be found in Appendix C.<br />

All the experiments are run on Allienware systems with Intel Core 2 Quad CPU<br />

Q9650 3.00GHZ processor, Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm hard disk, and 8 GB DDR<br />

RAM.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!