06.08.2013 Views

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3. BIFURCATION ANALYSIS 63<br />

Current Density (10 5 A/cm 2 )<br />

4.6<br />

4.5<br />

4.4<br />

4.3<br />

4.2<br />

4.1<br />

4<br />

3.9<br />

3.8<br />

3.7<br />

3.6<br />

0.23 0.232 0.234 0.236<br />

Voltage Difference (V)<br />

0.238 0.24 0.242<br />

Figure 3.5: Enlarged Portion of Curve Where Methods Were Compared<br />

number of nonlinear (Newton) iterations, and total time to take 7 pseudo arc-length<br />

continuation steps.<br />

Table 3.3: Comparison of Bordering and Householder Methods<br />

Method No. of GMRES Its. No. of Newton Its. Solution Time (sec)<br />

Bordering 8826 21 5905<br />

Householder 3026 15 2016<br />

We previously expected a factor of 2 savings from using Householder continuation<br />

instead of the bordering algorithm. The run times show a factor of 3 savings. An<br />

explanation of this is that, as previously stated, the Householder continuation linear<br />

solves were better conditioned than those of the bordering method. This is why

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!