10.08.2013 Views

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

condition consist<strong>in</strong>g of both dy<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> her house <strong>and</strong><br />

not hav<strong>in</strong>g a son to perform the death rituals. All these<br />

rituals <strong>and</strong> extra expenses were required for prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the corpse <strong>and</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g it pure enough to be h<strong>and</strong>ed over<br />

to the gods. Cosmogonically speak<strong>in</strong>g, everybody is<br />

equally pure when they enter the div<strong>in</strong>e sphere<br />

regardless of how much pollution humans have to deal<br />

with.<br />

To conclude, it seems that there are two levels of<br />

pollution <strong>and</strong> purity <strong>in</strong> relation to embodied s<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual’s further re<strong>in</strong>carnation. Firstly, the<br />

purification of the deceased’s body as a corpse of flesh<br />

belongs to the realm of the descendants. The relatives<br />

have to morn <strong>and</strong> purify the corpse <strong>in</strong> accordance with<br />

the level of varna purity/impurity. This is m<strong>and</strong>atory for<br />

all as a part of their varna obligations. The relatives<br />

mourn the varna s<strong>in</strong> or degree of impurity which is a<br />

static residue that works <strong>in</strong> accordance with the scheme<br />

of 11, 13, 15 or 30 days of pollution. Secondly, the<br />

deceased has to pay back his own s<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />

with his personal s<strong>in</strong>s or achievements, which work <strong>in</strong><br />

accordance with the karma theory. The former aspect is<br />

a cosmogonic matter, which works <strong>in</strong> accordance with<br />

the ritual obligations each person belong<strong>in</strong>g to a caste<br />

group has to fulfil as a part of their dharma. The latter<br />

aspect is more <strong>in</strong>dividual, stress<strong>in</strong>g personal karma <strong>and</strong><br />

further <strong>in</strong>carnation as a consequence of good <strong>and</strong> bad<br />

deeds. Although these two aspects are conjo<strong>in</strong>ed there is<br />

a difference between the collective <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

roles <strong>and</strong> duties <strong>in</strong> society <strong>and</strong> cosmos.<br />

211<br />

The consequences of approach<strong>in</strong>g funerals as a purify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process <strong>in</strong> relation to life-giv<strong>in</strong>g waters will be<br />

elaborated <strong>and</strong> synthesised <strong>in</strong> the conclusion. In order to<br />

enable such a conclusion I will now turn from the<br />

present to the past, search<strong>in</strong>g for various threads which<br />

may illum<strong>in</strong>ate developments of cosmogonic processes<br />

<strong>in</strong> religions on the sub-Indian cont<strong>in</strong>ent. The long time<br />

spans <strong>and</strong> the knowledge production of ancient,<br />

forgotten or re-discovered societies <strong>and</strong> peoples is one of<br />

the objectives of archaeology. Societies prior to, or<br />

without, written sources, belong to one special group of<br />

<strong>in</strong>quiries <strong>in</strong> archaeology. I will therefore approach death<br />

<strong>and</strong> life-giv<strong>in</strong>g waters from an archaeological<br />

perspective emphasis<strong>in</strong>g not only material culture <strong>in</strong> the<br />

present but <strong>in</strong> the past as well. My aim is to follow the<br />

progress of knowledge production literally from the<br />

cradle to the grave. Today’s tradition is the outcome of a<br />

tradition dat<strong>in</strong>g thous<strong>and</strong>s of years back. I started <strong>in</strong><br />

Nepal develop<strong>in</strong>g perspectives while witness<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cremations, <strong>and</strong> with this po<strong>in</strong>t of departure I have<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted cosmogonic processes. These <strong>in</strong>terpretations<br />

will subsequently be used as a theoretical framework<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of structural processes <strong>and</strong><br />

mortuary practices <strong>in</strong> the past. This is <strong>in</strong> one word, of<br />

course, an analogy, but I will argue that it is not only a<br />

simple <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omly chosen analogy, but a theoretically<br />

developed perspective <strong>and</strong> premise which enhances our<br />

knowledge of the past. The journey <strong>in</strong>to contemporary<br />

H<strong>in</strong>du practices <strong>and</strong> mythologies are therefore a<br />

thoroughly <strong>and</strong> theoretically developed approach, which<br />

opens up fields for <strong>in</strong>quiries, underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretations of the past (Kaliff & Oestigaard 2004).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!