10.08.2013 Views

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

stony desert. The polluted body was not <strong>in</strong> any way<br />

allowed to come <strong>in</strong> contact with the good earth, water, or<br />

plants. After the flesh was destructed, then the bones<br />

were gathered together <strong>and</strong> buried. This funerary<br />

purpose seems to solve the problem of the highly<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>and</strong> polluted flesh <strong>and</strong> set the spirit free to<br />

go to heaven (Boyce 1979:44-45).<br />

Persians <strong>and</strong> ancient funeral practices<br />

The ancient Indo-Iranian tribes developed a complex<br />

system of religious purity avoid<strong>in</strong>g pollution <strong>in</strong> which<br />

ritual purity was a safeguard aga<strong>in</strong>st evil. Ritual purity<br />

was <strong>in</strong> service of the gods, <strong>and</strong> the good creations were<br />

protected. It seems that “proto-Indo-Iranians” were one<br />

group among the “pit-grave” people of the steppes who<br />

buried their members; the lead<strong>in</strong>g members at the<br />

bottom of deep shafts covered by earthen barrows, <strong>and</strong><br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary people were presumably laid <strong>in</strong> simple graves<br />

<strong>in</strong> the earth of which no traces rema<strong>in</strong>. The Indians seem<br />

to have changed their funerary practice <strong>in</strong>to cremation<br />

whereas the Iranians seemed to have too great respect for<br />

the purity of the fire to use it for polluted purposes, <strong>and</strong><br />

it might be that <strong>in</strong> prehistoric times the practice of<br />

exposure which later became known as Zoroastrianism<br />

became common (Boyce 1979:14). The Zoroastrians<br />

lived at the steppe l<strong>and</strong>s to the East of the Caspian sea<br />

probably around 1500 BCE, but very little is known of<br />

the first thous<strong>and</strong> years of the Zoroastrian history due to<br />

the lack of written sources. Zoroaster came from a<br />

pastoral people who cared for <strong>and</strong> relied upon their<br />

animals as a way of life, <strong>and</strong> “it is likely that<br />

Zarathushtra came from a polytheistic back-ground with<br />

an <strong>in</strong>herent cosmic dualism, which he proceeded to<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>to a doctr<strong>in</strong>e of moral imperatives” (Russel<br />

2002:36).<br />

Zoroastrianism as a religion ga<strong>in</strong>ed popularity <strong>and</strong><br />

became a state religion <strong>in</strong> Iran. There were three ma<strong>in</strong><br />

Iranian dynasties: the Achaemenian, the Arsacid or the<br />

Parthian, <strong>and</strong> the Sasanian. It is by Cyrus the Great that<br />

the Achaemenian Empire was established, <strong>and</strong> he<br />

extended his little k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong> conquered all of Asia<br />

M<strong>in</strong>or <strong>and</strong> even the mighty Babylon. There is written a<br />

script on a barrel shaped clay cyl<strong>in</strong>der with the edict of<br />

Cyrus the Great declar<strong>in</strong>g the rights to the Jewish people<br />

Fig. 16.2. The Achaemenians 550-331 BCE.<br />

Cyrus the Great (550-530 BCE)<br />

Cambyses (530-522 BCE)<br />

Smerdis (522 BCE)<br />

Darius the Great (522-486 BCE)<br />

Xerxes I (486-465 BCE)<br />

Artaxerxes I (465-424 BCE)<br />

Xerxes II (424 BCE)<br />

to whom he allowed to return to Jerusalem after be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

released from captivity <strong>in</strong> Babylon. The cyl<strong>in</strong>der is<br />

known as the “Bill of Rights”, which proclaims Cyrus’<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gship <strong>and</strong> his triumph over the city of Babylon. Cyrus<br />

was seen as a Messiah. The biblical Esther was the<br />

Jewish wife of the Achaemenian k<strong>in</strong>g Artaxerxes.<br />

Xerxes burnt Athens <strong>in</strong> 480 BCE <strong>and</strong> the Achaemenian<br />

Empire lasted until Alex<strong>and</strong>er <strong>in</strong>vaded Iran <strong>in</strong> 331 BCE<br />

<strong>and</strong> conquered Persepolis <strong>in</strong> 330 BCE.<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er described Persepolis as “the most hateful of<br />

the cities <strong>in</strong> Asia” (Wheeler 1968:20). The royal palace<br />

of Persepolis was the richest under the sun <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Macedonians plundered it without satisfy<strong>in</strong>g their greed<br />

for more. With the fall of the Persian empire through the<br />

conquest of Alex<strong>and</strong>er the Great, Palest<strong>in</strong>e was no<br />

longer under Persian dom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence but<br />

became a part of the Hellenistic Seleucid K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong><br />

later the Romans (Shaked 2002). In the West Alex<strong>and</strong>er<br />

is known as “The Great” but <strong>in</strong> Iranian texts he is known<br />

as “Alex<strong>and</strong>er the Accursed” because of his destruction<br />

of Persepolis <strong>and</strong> the persecution of the priesthood.<br />

When he died <strong>in</strong> 323 BCE his empire was divided<br />

between his generals, <strong>and</strong> the Greek general Seleucus<br />

took control over Iran <strong>and</strong> the successors became the<br />

Seleucids. In areas controlled by the Iranian Parthian<br />

dynasty, they expelled foreigners, who basically were<br />

Greeks. The Parthians were faithful to their religious<br />

heritage, <strong>and</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g their rule the first moves took place<br />

to collect the rituals <strong>and</strong> the doctr<strong>in</strong>al traditions <strong>and</strong> put<br />

them together <strong>in</strong>to a holy book: the Avesta (H<strong>in</strong>nells<br />

1981:18-21). Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s conquest of the Achaemenian<br />

Empire robbed the Zoroastrians of the power <strong>and</strong> wealth,<br />

<strong>and</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to tradition it caused the loss of the sacred<br />

texts, which then were transmitted orally. The Avestan<br />

texts were re-written dur<strong>in</strong>g the Sasanias, <strong>and</strong><br />

Zoroastrianism underwent a religious development<br />

(Boyce 2002b:57-59).<br />

For the moment I will only focus on the Achaemenians<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the next chapter on Taxila will lay emphasis on<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s conquest <strong>and</strong> the subsequent dynasties,<br />

conflicts, <strong>and</strong> cooperation between the Zoroastrian,<br />

Buddhist, <strong>and</strong> Greek empires. The rule of the<br />

Achaemenians started with Cyrus the Great <strong>and</strong> lasted<br />

until Darius III’s defeat (fig. 16.2).<br />

Sogdianus (424 BCE)<br />

Darius II (423-404 BCE)<br />

Artaxerxes II (404-358 BCE)<br />

Artaxerxes III (358-338 BCE)<br />

Arses (338-336 BCE)<br />

Darius III (336-331 BCE)<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!