10.08.2013 Views

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taxila was probably one of many cities <strong>in</strong> the Mauryan<br />

Empire which received from Asoka a share of holy<br />

relics, <strong>and</strong> that Dharmarajika was the orig<strong>in</strong>al stupa<br />

erected by him to house that share. The stupa at Taxila is<br />

not only the biggest, but also the oldest, <strong>and</strong> if Asoka<br />

built one at Taxila, it is most likely to be this one (figs.<br />

17.4-17.5). However, there are only tangible <strong>in</strong>dications<br />

that there were any monuments of Asoka at all at Taxila,<br />

<strong>and</strong> very few <strong>in</strong>dications of monuments that can be<br />

clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> recognised as Mauryan. The majority<br />

of the Buddhist monuments are not found with<strong>in</strong> the city<br />

walls but <strong>in</strong> quiet <strong>and</strong> retired spots some distance outside<br />

them. The diameter of the Dharmarajika stupa is 150 ft,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the present height of the ru<strong>in</strong> is 45 ft. No part of the<br />

surviv<strong>in</strong>g stupa can clearly be dated to the Mauryan<br />

period. However, that does not mean that the lower parts<br />

or the foundation cannot be dated to this period, but it is<br />

impossible to say if it is built <strong>in</strong> the first, second, or third<br />

century BCE. What is sure is that it cannot be older than<br />

Asoka, <strong>and</strong> it cannot be later than the middle half of the<br />

first century BCE, because it was <strong>in</strong> this century a series<br />

of small stupas were erected <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>in</strong>g around the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

edifice, <strong>and</strong> this would not have been possible unless the<br />

Dharmarajika had already been made (Marshall<br />

1951a:235-236). The Great Stupa was rebuilt <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

century CE, <strong>and</strong> a subsequent build<strong>in</strong>g phase took place<br />

from the fourth to the fifth century CE (ibid:239).<br />

Although Buddha himself never visited Taxila, the place<br />

became a great centre of Buddhist learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Taxila <strong>and</strong> G<strong>and</strong>hara regions became<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>antly Buddhist dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> after the reign of<br />

Asoka <strong>in</strong> the third century BCE (Dar 1984:12, 43). In the<br />

latter part of the first century BC monuments <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>scriptions alike leave no doubt that the prevail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

religion at Taxila was Buddhism. Zoroastrianism or<br />

other earlier faiths, however, may have prevailed, <strong>and</strong><br />

the Saka rulers were tolerant towards every religion<br />

whether it was Buddhism, Ja<strong>in</strong>ism, or Brahmanism<br />

(Marshall 1951a:58). But more than mere tolerance for<br />

other religions may expla<strong>in</strong> the co-existence of multiple<br />

<strong>and</strong> overlapp<strong>in</strong>g traits; there was a shared horizon of<br />

worldviews among the <strong>in</strong>habitants of Taxila.<br />

Particularly Buddhist statues reveal a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

various cultural <strong>and</strong> religious impulses, <strong>and</strong> Buddha<br />

statues found at Taxila have a very “Greek” or Greco-<br />

Roman look.<br />

Some Buddhas are depicted wear<strong>in</strong>g toga from Imperial<br />

Rome. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Foucher, the strong classical look of<br />

the G<strong>and</strong>haran Buddha images is a result of Hellenistic<br />

imperialism (Foucher 1942), <strong>and</strong> Bachhofer states,<br />

“G<strong>and</strong>haran art would not have been possible without<br />

the Hellenistic art of the Greek communities <strong>and</strong> courts<br />

<strong>in</strong> Bactria <strong>and</strong> India” (Bachhofer 1941:224). In<br />

G<strong>and</strong>hara art the spectacle of classical forms endeavours<br />

va<strong>in</strong>ly to express <strong>in</strong> material terms the ideals of an<br />

immaterial religion, <strong>and</strong> the art is both an offshoot of<br />

Hellenistic sculptures <strong>in</strong> the East <strong>and</strong> Roman Imperial art<br />

263<br />

(Rowl<strong>and</strong> 1942). “There are certa<strong>in</strong> figures <strong>in</strong> the<br />

architecture of the Asoka period, creatures, man-headed<br />

bulls, <strong>and</strong> other half-human types, which may be due to<br />

Greek <strong>in</strong>fluences, probably filtered through a Persian<br />

medium; but the explanation of their adaptation may be<br />

entirely religious or philosophical” (Tarn 1902:284).<br />

They may symbolise the doctr<strong>in</strong>e of transmigration <strong>and</strong><br />

rebirth s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> each stage of animal existence the human<br />

may be concealed <strong>and</strong> released through good works<br />

(ibid). The date of the Buddhist art is debated, but at<br />

Taxila there is almost no evidence of such art prior to the<br />

Kushan regime <strong>in</strong> the latter half of the first century CE<br />

(Soper 1951:301). Among other f<strong>in</strong>ds, from Build<strong>in</strong>g L<br />

near the Dharmarajika Stupa there is found a Buddha<br />

with a moustache after the model of an early Imperial<br />

toga statue. This is a stone plaque with donors around a<br />

preach<strong>in</strong>g Buddha (fig. 17.6). The pre-Roman phase is<br />

represented at a fairly high level of sculptural<br />

competence <strong>in</strong> the Dharmarajika frieze; “Absence of<br />

religious formality is revealed by the small halo of the<br />

realistic seat…the perfunctory drapery l<strong>in</strong>es show an<br />

<strong>in</strong>difference to classical values. The figures, for all their<br />

variety <strong>in</strong> detail, st<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> almost identical three-quarters<br />

poses, <strong>in</strong> the superimposed tiers normal <strong>in</strong> non-classical<br />

art” (ibid:311). Another reveal<strong>in</strong>g statue is the image of<br />

the Bodhisattva Maitreya (fig. 17.7) st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g on a<br />

pedestal where the front is supported at the corners by<br />

Cor<strong>in</strong>thian pilasters (see Appendix E for a detailed<br />

account of these two f<strong>in</strong>ds, for other f<strong>in</strong>ds see Marshall<br />

1951b).<br />

Although not a part of my core area, I feel it is<br />

nevertheless necessary to mention the world’s largest<br />

Buddha statues <strong>in</strong> the Bamiyan valley <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan,<br />

which were demolished by the Taliban <strong>in</strong> 2001. This site<br />

is important not only for Indian art, but also for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>timate relationship to the art of Iran <strong>and</strong> Central Asia,<br />

<strong>and</strong> all the styles at Bamiyan are hybrid <strong>in</strong> character. The<br />

Buddha statues measured respectively 175 <strong>and</strong> 120 feet.<br />

“These two statues <strong>in</strong> themselves are extraord<strong>in</strong>arily<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to illustrate the cosmopolitan nature of<br />

Buddhist art at Bamiyan. The smaller statue (fig. 17.8) is<br />

simply an enormous magnification of a typical G<strong>and</strong>hara<br />

image with its volum<strong>in</strong>ous drapery rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of the<br />

style prevalent <strong>in</strong> north-western India <strong>in</strong> the second <strong>and</strong><br />

third centuries A.D.” (Rowl<strong>and</strong> 1959:98). The larger of<br />

the two Buddhas is made <strong>in</strong> a quite different style,<br />

although the method is basically the same.<br />

If the smaller is made <strong>in</strong> the third or fourth century CE,<br />

the larger is probably made a century later. The statues<br />

are extraord<strong>in</strong>aire due to the appearance of the colossal<br />

cult, which is an impulse from the west. Moreover, the<br />

various domical forms are iconographically <strong>and</strong><br />

stylistically derived from Greco-Roman <strong>and</strong> Iranian<br />

sources. “We have, of course, the precedent of the<br />

famous colossi of the Greek world, <strong>and</strong>, more nearly<br />

contemporary, the later Roman fashion of erect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

colossal images of the deified Caesars.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!