Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> 63 Breast Cancer 13<br />
3.3 MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-RISK WOMEN<br />
3.3.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition of high-risk<br />
A dist<strong>in</strong>ction should be made between genetic and familial risk for develop<strong>in</strong>g breast<br />
cancer:<br />
• Women <strong>with</strong> a proven mutation of the BRCA1, BRCA2 or TP53 gene<br />
are considered to be at genetic risk.<br />
• For the calculation of the familial risk, several models are available.<br />
Recently, Amir et al. compared four of these models [9], and<br />
concluded the Tyrer-Cuzick model to be the most consistently<br />
accurate model for the prediction of breast cancer (rate of expected to<br />
observed number of breast cancers = 0.81). This model <strong>in</strong>corporates<br />
the BRCA genes, a low penetrance gene and personal risk factors, such<br />
as age at menarche, parity, height, etc [10]. The model has been<br />
computerised and an <strong>in</strong>teractive program is available from the authors<br />
on request [10]. Women <strong>with</strong> a lifetime risk of 20% or greater of<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g breast cancer are considered to be at high risk.<br />
3.3.2 Breast cancer susceptibility gene test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Two CPGs of good quality were found on breast cancer susceptibility gene test<strong>in</strong>g [11,<br />
12]. No additional evidence was identified. The recommendations from these CPGs<br />
were only slightly rephrased and adapted to the local Belgian context. We refer to the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al CPGs for the evidence base.<br />
3. Rout<strong>in</strong>e referral for genetic counsell<strong>in</strong>g or rout<strong>in</strong>e breast cancer<br />
susceptibility gene (BRCA) test<strong>in</strong>g for women whose family or personal<br />
history is not associated <strong>with</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for deleterious mutations <strong>in</strong><br />
breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) or breast cancer susceptibility<br />
gene 2 (BRCA2) is not recommended (1B evidence) [12].<br />
4. Women whose family or personal history is associated <strong>with</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
risk for:<br />
• deleterious mutations <strong>in</strong> BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 gene (early-age-onset breast cancer,<br />
two primary breast cancers and/or breast and ovarian cancers <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual or close relatives on the same side of the family, known mutation <strong>in</strong> a<br />
family member, Ashkenazi Jewish decent <strong>with</strong> breast cancer <strong>in</strong> women < 50 years<br />
or ovarian cancer, male breast cancer, more than one ovarian cancer on the<br />
same side of the family);<br />
• Li-Fraumeni and Cowden Syndrome (thyroid cancer, sarcoma, adrenocortical<br />
cancer, endometrium cancer, pancreatic cancer, bra<strong>in</strong> tumors, dermatologic<br />
manifestations, leukemia/lymphoma)<br />
should be referred for genetic counsell<strong>in</strong>g (1B evidence) [11, 12].<br />
5. All high-risk women should have access to <strong>in</strong>formation on genetic tests<br />
aimed at mutation f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (1C evidence) [11].<br />
6. Pre-test counsell<strong>in</strong>g (preferably two sessions) should be undertaken (1A<br />
evidence) [11].<br />
7. Discussion of genetic test<strong>in</strong>g (predictive and mutation f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g) should be<br />
undertaken by someone <strong>with</strong> appropriate tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (1A evidence) [11].<br />
8. High-risk women and their affected relatives should be <strong>in</strong>formed about the<br />
likely <strong>in</strong>formativeness of the test (the mean<strong>in</strong>g of a positive and a negative<br />
test) and the likely timescale of be<strong>in</strong>g given the results (1A evidence) [11].