10.08.2013 Views

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 63A)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> 63 Breast Cancer 43<br />

159. Ellis, I.O., et al., Best Practice No 176: Updated recommendations for HER2 test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

UK.[see comment]. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Pathology, 2004. 57(3): p. 233-7.<br />

160. Ellis, I.O., et al., Best Practice No 179. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for breast needle core biopsy handl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> breast screen<strong>in</strong>g assessment. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Pathology, 2004. 57(9): p. 897-902.<br />

161. P<strong>in</strong>ero, A., et al., Palpable breast lesions: utility of Doppler sonography for diagnosis of<br />

malignancy. Breast, 2003. 12(4): p. 258-63.<br />

162. Schelfout, K., et al., Contrast-enhanced MR imag<strong>in</strong>g of breast lesions and effect on treatment.<br />

Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004. 30(5): p. 501-7.<br />

163. H<strong>in</strong>d, D., et al., Surgery versus primary endocr<strong>in</strong>e therapy for operable primary breast cancer<br />

<strong>in</strong> elderly women (70 years plus). Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006(1): p. CD004272.<br />

164. Poggi, M.M., et al., Eighteen-year results <strong>in</strong> the treatment of early breast carc<strong>in</strong>oma <strong>with</strong><br />

mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized<br />

Trial.[see comment]. Cancer, 2003. 98(4): p. 697-702.<br />

165. Fentiman, I.S., et al., Treatment of operable breast cancer <strong>in</strong> the elderly: a randomised cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

trial EORTC 10850 compar<strong>in</strong>g modified radical mastectomy <strong>with</strong> tumorectomy plus<br />

tamoxifen.[see comment]. European Journal of Cancer, 2003. 39(3): p. 300-8.<br />

166. Arriagada, R., et al., Late local recurrences <strong>in</strong> a randomised trial compar<strong>in</strong>g conservative<br />

treatment <strong>with</strong> total mastectomy <strong>in</strong> early breast cancer patients.[see comment]. Annals of<br />

Oncology, 2003. 14(11): p. 1617-22.<br />

167. Rudenstam, C.-M., et al., Randomized trial compar<strong>in</strong>g axillary clearance versus no axillary<br />

clearance <strong>in</strong> older patients <strong>with</strong> breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study<br />

Group Trial 10-93.[see comment]. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Oncology, 2006. 24(3): p. 337-44.<br />

168. Kodama, H., et al., Ten-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled study compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

level-I vs level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 2006.<br />

95(7): p. 811-6.<br />

169. Purushotham, A.D., et al., Morbidity after sent<strong>in</strong>el lymph node biopsy <strong>in</strong> primary breast<br />

cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Oncology, 2005. 23(19): p.<br />

4312-21.<br />

170. Martelli, G., et al., A randomized trial compar<strong>in</strong>g axillary dissection to no axillary dissection <strong>in</strong><br />

older patients <strong>with</strong> T1N0 breast cancer: results after 5 years of follow-up. Annals of Surgery, 2005.<br />

242(1): p. 1-6; discussion 7-9.<br />

171. Tom<strong>in</strong>aga, T., S. Takashima, and M. Danno, Randomized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial compar<strong>in</strong>g level II and<br />

level III axillary node dissection <strong>in</strong> addition to mastectomy for breast cancer. British Journal of<br />

Surgery, 2004. 91(1): p. 38-43.<br />

172. Ford, H.T., et al., Long-term follow-up of a randomised trial designed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the need<br />

for irradiation follow<strong>in</strong>g conservative surgery for the treatment of <strong>in</strong>vasive breast cancer. Annals of<br />

Oncology, 2006. 17(3): p. 401-8.<br />

173. Clarke, M., et al., Effects of radiotherapy and of differences <strong>in</strong> the extent of surgery for early<br />

breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.<br />

Lancet, 2005. 366(9503): p. 2087-106.<br />

174. W<strong>in</strong>zer, K.J., et al., Radiation therapy after breast-conserv<strong>in</strong>g surgery; first results of a<br />

randomised cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial <strong>in</strong> patients <strong>with</strong> low risk of recurrence. European Journal of Cancer, 2004.<br />

40(7): p. 998-1005.<br />

175. V<strong>in</strong>h-Hung, V. and C. Verschraegen, Breast-conserv<strong>in</strong>g surgery <strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out radiotherapy:<br />

pooled-analysis for risks of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and mortality.[see comment].<br />

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004. 96(2): p. 115-21.<br />

176. Van de Steene, J., et al., Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer: effects of longer follow-up.<br />

Radiotherapy & Oncology, 2004. 72(1): p. 35-43.<br />

177. Fyles, A.W., et al., Tamoxifen <strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out breast irradiation <strong>in</strong> women 50 years of age or<br />

older <strong>with</strong> early breast cancer.[see comment]. New England Journal of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 2004. 351(10): p.<br />

963-70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!