13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In these analysis areas the area of potentially affected habitat for motorized big game<br />

retrieval is reduced by 100% under Alternative E, 83 to 93% under Alternative D, 0 to<br />

30% under Alternative F, 83 to 93% under Alternative G, and 0 to 10% under Alternative<br />

C.<br />

Table72: Southwestern willow flycatcher federally listed species and critical habitat<br />

determinations by alternative<br />

Federally Listed<br />

Species<br />

Southwestern willow<br />

flycatcher<br />

Southwestern willow<br />

flycatcher<br />

Critical Habitat<br />

Rationale for<br />

species<br />

determination<br />

Rationale for<br />

critical habitat<br />

determination<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing<br />

Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

*MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA<br />

MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA<br />

Long-term beneficial effects under alternative E are greater than the<br />

other action alternatives. Under alternatives D, F and G, the effects<br />

are very similar, except for motorized big game retrieval, which has<br />

reduced effects in alternatives D and G; under alternative F, the<br />

access into these analysis areas is similar to alternative B. Under<br />

alternative C there is less of a reduction in motorized routes in<br />

southwestern willow flycatcher critical habitat and less a reduction<br />

in acres of potential habitat available to motorized big game<br />

retrieval in both analysis areas. southwestern willow flycatchers<br />

are associated with riparian type habitats that are more susceptible to<br />

damage by cross-country motorized use than upland habitats;<br />

therefore, the relative potential for big game retrieval to affect<br />

southwestern willow flycatcherhabitat is greater under alternative<br />

F and C than the other action alternatives. The four action<br />

alternatives do change the use within portions of each of the analysis<br />

areas, proposing administrative use. This change in use causes less<br />

effects than roads and trails open to all of the public. The level of<br />

potential effect under alternatives C, D, E, F, and G are reduced to<br />

an insignificant and discountable level; therefore, a determination of<br />

“may affect, not likely to adversely affect” is made for these the<br />

alternatives.<br />

All action alternatives reduce the level of effect to southwestern<br />

willow flycatcher critical habitat. Under all alternatives, the number<br />

of stream crossings remains the same, but the use is changed to<br />

administrative use only, reducing the level of effect to an<br />

insignificant and discountable level. For these reasons, a<br />

determination of “May affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” is<br />

made for designated southwestern willow flycatcher critical<br />

habitat.<br />

*MANLAA - May affect not likely to adversely affect; **MALAA- May affect likely to adversely affect determination<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!