13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Barriers to Animal Travel or Movement – Preclusion of dispersal, migration, or<br />

other movements as posed by a road itself or by human activities on or near a road<br />

or road network.<br />

Route for competitors and predators – Human induced change in the environment<br />

that provides access for competitors or predators that would not have existed<br />

otherwise.<br />

Physiological Response – Changes in levels of stress hormones and heart rate as a<br />

result of proximity to roads or tails.<br />

Analysis Factors<br />

Knight and Cole (1995) developed a conceptual model of the responses of wildlife to<br />

recreational activities. They grouped recreational impacts into four groups harvest,<br />

habitat modification, disturbance, and pollution. Liddle (1997) grouped road impacts into<br />

three groups: Disturbance type 1 occurs when an animal sees, smells, hears, or perceives<br />

the presence of a human but no contact is made and it may or may not alter behavior;<br />

Disturbance type 2 is when habitat is changed in some way; and Disturbance type 3<br />

involves human actions in which there is direct damaging contact with the animal.<br />

Gaines et al. (2003) grouped Wisdom et al. (2000), Knight and Cole (1991), and Liddle<br />

(1997) classification schemes as described in columns 1 to 3 in Table 7. We’ve further<br />

grouped the analysis factors into harvest/direct affects and disturbance/indirect affects, as<br />

described in column 4 in Table 7.<br />

Table 7: Responses of wildlife to various disturbance factors<br />

Road and Trail Knight and Cole<br />

Liddle Combined Analysis<br />

Associated Factors Recreation Activity<br />

Factors<br />

Disturbance, Displacement,<br />

Avoidance, Harassment<br />

Disturbance Disturbance type 1 Disturbance<br />

Physiological Response Disturbance Disturbance type 1 Disturbance<br />

Habitat Loss and Fragmentation Habitat Modification Disturbance type 2 Disturbance<br />

Negative Edge Effects Habitat Modification Disturbance type 2 Disturbance<br />

Snag and Downed Log<br />

Reductions<br />

Habitat Modification Disturbance type 2 Disturbance<br />

Barriers to Animal Travel or<br />

Movement<br />

Habitat Modification Disturbance type 2 Disturbance<br />

Route for competitors and<br />

predators<br />

Habitat Modification Disturbance type 2 Disturbance<br />

Collisions Harvest Disturbance type 3 Harvest<br />

Harvest or Collection<br />

Facilitated by Motorized travel<br />

Harvest Disturbance type 3 Harvest<br />

Focal Species<br />

Ecologists have used different systems to evaluate the potential effects of an activity on<br />

species (Lambeck 1997 and Millsap et al 1990). The focal species approach is one of<br />

these systems (Lambeck 1997). Focal species are species that are used to represent a<br />

group of species because they are sensitive to a particular activity. Carroll et al. (2001)<br />

and Watson et al. (2001) recently tested this approach for wide-ranging carnivores and<br />

birds (respectively), with favorable results. Research related to road affects to federally<br />

listed and R3 sensitive species in this region of the Forest Service is limited; using the<br />

focal species approach allows the Gila to use literature related to different groups of<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!