13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Issues identified during scoping related to terrestrial wildlife species<br />

Motorized Routes<br />

The proposed motorized routes specifically the type, extent, level of use and location of<br />

motorized routes may lead to resource, recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />

Motorized Dispersed Recreation<br />

Motorized dispersed camping within proposed designated corridors and areas may lead to<br />

resource, recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />

Motorized Big Game Retrieval<br />

The proposed motorized big game retrieval (MBGR) may lead to resource, recreation,<br />

social and economic impacts.<br />

Area<br />

The proposed designated area specifically for OHV activities may lead to resource,<br />

recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES<br />

Ungulates<br />

Table 9: Ungulate species selected to be analyzed and rationale for selection<br />

Species Analyzed Rationale For Selection<br />

Elk Game species identified as species of concern during scoping<br />

Pronghorn Game species identified as species of concern during scoping<br />

Bighorn sheep Forest Service Sensitive Species<br />

The Arizona Game and Fish Department document that research related to road effects<br />

on ungulates did not begin until the 1970’s (Gagnon et al., 2007). Gagnon et al. (2007),<br />

literature review concentrated on traffic levels or road type effects on ungulates. Of the<br />

53 sources reviewed 47% of the papers suggested deer were affected by traffic/road type,<br />

84% elk, 80% bighorn sheep, and 100% pronghorn (Gagnon et al., 2007). Their findings<br />

suggest that wild ungulates do not always respond to the same level.<br />

As described in the analysis factor section, motorized and recreation effects to ungulates<br />

can be grouped into two analysis factors:<br />

1. A greater potential for harvest or direct effects, and/or<br />

2. Disturbance or indirect effects, avoiding or changing behavior in the area adjacent<br />

to where these type activities are occurring.<br />

Increases in ungulate harvest are associated with increased access. Rowland et al. (2005)<br />

states that elk vulnerability to harvest increases as open road density increases. This<br />

statement is supported by the literature (Unsworth et al. 1993, Gratson and Whitman<br />

2000, and Hayes et al. 2002). Diefenbach et al. (2005) <strong>report</strong>ed that deer hunters are<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!