Wildlife Specialist report
Wildlife Specialist report
Wildlife Specialist report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Issues identified during scoping related to terrestrial wildlife species<br />
Motorized Routes<br />
The proposed motorized routes specifically the type, extent, level of use and location of<br />
motorized routes may lead to resource, recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />
Motorized Dispersed Recreation<br />
Motorized dispersed camping within proposed designated corridors and areas may lead to<br />
resource, recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />
Motorized Big Game Retrieval<br />
The proposed motorized big game retrieval (MBGR) may lead to resource, recreation,<br />
social and economic impacts.<br />
Area<br />
The proposed designated area specifically for OHV activities may lead to resource,<br />
recreation, social and economic impacts.<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES<br />
Ungulates<br />
Table 9: Ungulate species selected to be analyzed and rationale for selection<br />
Species Analyzed Rationale For Selection<br />
Elk Game species identified as species of concern during scoping<br />
Pronghorn Game species identified as species of concern during scoping<br />
Bighorn sheep Forest Service Sensitive Species<br />
The Arizona Game and Fish Department document that research related to road effects<br />
on ungulates did not begin until the 1970’s (Gagnon et al., 2007). Gagnon et al. (2007),<br />
literature review concentrated on traffic levels or road type effects on ungulates. Of the<br />
53 sources reviewed 47% of the papers suggested deer were affected by traffic/road type,<br />
84% elk, 80% bighorn sheep, and 100% pronghorn (Gagnon et al., 2007). Their findings<br />
suggest that wild ungulates do not always respond to the same level.<br />
As described in the analysis factor section, motorized and recreation effects to ungulates<br />
can be grouped into two analysis factors:<br />
1. A greater potential for harvest or direct effects, and/or<br />
2. Disturbance or indirect effects, avoiding or changing behavior in the area adjacent<br />
to where these type activities are occurring.<br />
Increases in ungulate harvest are associated with increased access. Rowland et al. (2005)<br />
states that elk vulnerability to harvest increases as open road density increases. This<br />
statement is supported by the literature (Unsworth et al. 1993, Gratson and Whitman<br />
2000, and Hayes et al. 2002). Diefenbach et al. (2005) <strong>report</strong>ed that deer hunters are<br />
19