13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sensitive Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Narrow-headed gartersnake MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Reticulate Gila monster MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Rationale For Determination Under alternatives D to G, the potential effects to reptiles and amphibians are<br />

reduced, particularly under alternative E. Under alternative C there is an increase<br />

in motorized routes in the Mexican gartersnake, and Gila Monster analysis areas;<br />

and a 1% decrease in the Arizona toad and narrow-headed gartersnake analysis<br />

area. Under alternatives F and C, the amount of available habitat in riparian<br />

species habitat accessible to motorized big game retrieval remains high. This<br />

activity may not occur often in this habitat type, but as stated with other riparian<br />

species/groups, the potential to cause several years of damage with a single entry<br />

is high. The amount of potentially affected habitat in a given year would be<br />

small, considering the relatively low number of motorized game retrievals that<br />

could occur in a given year and the amount of Forest Service land that this<br />

activity has the potential to occur in. The potential to affect individuals under all<br />

action alternatives still exists; therefore, a determination of “may impact” is<br />

made for all action alternatives. None of the alternatives would affect the<br />

viability of these species or the viability of any other reptile or amphibian that<br />

occurs on the Gila National Forest.<br />

*MI – May impact<br />

Avian Analysis<br />

Analyses for this document in regard to avian species are based on an extensive literature<br />

review, the Gila National Forest Plan, The Mexican Spotted Owl Recovery Plan,<br />

Northern Goshawk Management Recommendations (GTR RM-17), and the New Mexico<br />

Partners in Flight (NMPIF) Draft Land Bird Conservation Plan for the State of New<br />

Mexico (New Mexico Partners in Flight 2010).<br />

Studies examining the effects that motorized roads have on avifauna are relatively<br />

numerous compared to guilds of other species such as large carnivores, and amphibians.<br />

Studies emphasizing the direct effect of road mortality to bird species were historically<br />

most prevalent, with more recent ornithological analyses focusing on habitat<br />

fragmentation, habitat modification, and road effects to migratory bird species. Liddle<br />

(1997) states that road building and particularly alteration of roadside habitat, can have a<br />

major effect on passerine (songbird) species. Volume of traffic was shown to have a<br />

quantitative effect on the density of nesting birds (Reijnen et al. 1995), with noise<br />

identified as the main disturbance factor. Edges of roads with low traffic densities may<br />

actually provide nesting areas for some species, if managed properly (Warner 1992).<br />

Gaines et al. (2003) summarized motorized routes’ effects to focal species of birds<br />

occurring as edge effects, habitat loss or fragmentation, disturbance at specific sites,<br />

collisions, snag reduction, physiological response, and routes for competitors or<br />

predators. Habitats important to bird species vary widely according to each species’ life<br />

history, and occur across the entire forest. As with analyses for the other guilds of species<br />

in this analysis, it is appropriate for focal species to be selected from each habitat type to<br />

be selected. Analysis was conducted for the following guilds of avian species: raptorial<br />

birds, primary cavity nesters, riparian birds, songbirds from forested areas, songbirds<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!