13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the focal species and their associated analysis areas Alternative E adds 0 to 5 miles of<br />

routes, Alternatives D adds 3 to 46 miles, Alternative F adds 1 to 59 miles, Alternative G<br />

add 1 to 57 miles, and Alternative C adds 1 to 97 miles of unauthorized routes.<br />

Alternative C is the only alternative that allows for an actual increase in miles of routes<br />

through the associated analysis areas. Because the Gila currently allows cross country<br />

travel most proposed routes even though unauthorized are currently being used.<br />

Findings:<br />

Table88: Upland non-game and song birds Forest Service sensitive species determination<br />

by alternative<br />

Sensitive Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing<br />

Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Burrowing owl MI MI MI MI MI<br />

White-eared hummingbird MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Costa’s hummingbird MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Gray vireo MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Rationale for<br />

determination<br />

*MI – May impact<br />

Under alternatives D, E, F, and G, the potential effects to upland nongame birds<br />

are reduced. Alternative C slightly increases the overall miles of motorized<br />

routes, but reduces the effects of motorized cross-country travel. The potential to<br />

affect individuals under all action alternatives still exists; therefore, a<br />

determination of “may impact” is made for all action alternatives. None of the<br />

alternatives would affect the viability of these species or cause a trend toward<br />

Federal listing.<br />

Table 89: Plain titmouse Gila National Forest management indicator species determination<br />

by alternative<br />

Management<br />

Indicator<br />

Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Plain titmouse *NA NA NA NA NA<br />

Rationale For<br />

Determination<br />

Under alternatives D, E, F, and G, the potential effects to this focal species are reduced.<br />

Alternative C slightly increases the overall miles of motorized routes, but reduces the effects<br />

of motorized cross-country travel. The potential to affect individuals under all action<br />

alternatives exists. Population and habitat trends for the Plain titmouse would not be affected<br />

by any of the action alternatives.<br />

*NA – No adverse effects to the population or habitat trends<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!