13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Elk (Game Species identified as species of concern during scoping) - Several factors<br />

influence avoidance/disturbance (potential zone of influence) distances by elk adjacent to<br />

roads: traffic rates, cover adjacent to roads, topography, and type of road (Rowland et al.<br />

2005). To analyze the change in potential disturbance affects of motorized activities to<br />

elk we will use 300 m for motorized trails, and 650 m for roads. These distances are<br />

approximately the middle distance between the different studies reviewed. Additionally,<br />

these distances will help account for variables like topography and cover.<br />

The New Mexico Department of Game and Fish has mapped core elk habitat on the<br />

Forest; for this analysis the analysis indicators (mile/density and disturbance zone) will<br />

analyze the change in these areas by alternative from the existing condition.<br />

Bighorn Sheep (Forest Service Sensitive Species and Ungulate Focal Species) -<br />

Papouchis et al. (2001) <strong>report</strong>ed that their findings were consistent with other research<br />

that roads cause a zone of influence larger than the road itself. In high use areas some<br />

sheep do habituate to road traffic but more typically the closer to a road the more likely<br />

sheep will flee. Papouchis et al. (2001) found that on average sheep fled when within<br />

132 m of a road, were alerted when within 363 m, and did not respond at 821 m.<br />

MacArthur et al. (1979) found vehicle traffic caused a change in bighorn sheep heart<br />

rates 14.3% of the time when a vehicle was within 200 m. To analyze disturbance<br />

affects of motorized activities to bighorn sheep this analysis will use disturbance zone of<br />

200 m.<br />

On the Gila National Forest, the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish began reintroductions<br />

of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep into historical desert bighorn sheep<br />

habitat in March 1964, with the release of 10 bighorns from Banff at the junction of<br />

Turkey Creek and the Gila River in southwestern New Mexico. The Turkey Creek<br />

population was augmented in 2005 and 2006 with 30 animals. The current population is<br />

estimated at 80 animals and is considered stable after declining for many years (Ramsey<br />

personal communication 2007). In September 1964, 18 Rocky Mountain bighorns from<br />

the Sandias were released near the San Francisco River canyon of southwestern New<br />

Mexico. This transplant was considered a success with a 1989 population estimate of<br />

250 animals occupying the canyon for 30 miles, ranging into Arizona (BISON-M 2009).<br />

However, by spring 2006, the population was approximately 66 animals, a result of two<br />

die offs occurring in 1995-1996 and late in 2005. The cause of these die-offs was due to<br />

pneumonia outbreaks from contact with domestic sheep near the Blue in Arizona<br />

(Ramsay pers. comm. 2007).<br />

The New Mexico Department of Game and Fish has mapped core bighorn sheep habitat<br />

on the Forest; for this analysis the analysis indicators (mile/density and disturbance zone)<br />

will analyze the change in these areas by alternative from the existing condition.<br />

Pronghorn (Game Species identified as species of concern during scoping) -<br />

Avoidance/disturbance distance literature related to motorized affects to pronghorn is<br />

lacking. Several researchers discuss how roads fragment pronghorn habitat and cause<br />

flight responses, but do not provide response distance. Gagnon et al. (2007) completed a<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!