Supporting documents - Renfrewshire Council
Supporting documents - Renfrewshire Council
Supporting documents - Renfrewshire Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX 1<br />
PAN 33 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST<br />
Question/Issue Comments<br />
Has the site been classified as statutorily<br />
contaminated?<br />
No<br />
Is the site known or suspected to be<br />
contaminated?<br />
Are previous uses likely to have left the site in a<br />
contaminated state?<br />
Does the site require investigation prior to the<br />
determination of the application?<br />
Has the local authority gathered information on<br />
the site in meeting the requirements of Part IIA?<br />
Does the local authority possess any<br />
information on the type and extent of<br />
contamination?<br />
Have studies already been undertaken on the<br />
site?<br />
Is the developer in possession of relevant<br />
information on contamination?<br />
Has the developer thoroughly investigated the<br />
site?<br />
Potentially. Previous site use was industrial with<br />
railway sidings, goods depots, iron foundry,<br />
starch works, engineering works, PFS and<br />
warehousing. There is the potential for a range<br />
of contaminants to remain on site and migrate<br />
to off site receptors.<br />
As above. Site and surroundings located within<br />
heavy industrial area with iron foundry and<br />
heavy engineering. Industrial land uses<br />
remained until the late 1980’s when<br />
warehousing recreational facilities (ten pin<br />
bowling centre) and car parking occupied the<br />
site<br />
Unknown, although considered quite likely and<br />
to be dealt with by application of suspensive<br />
planning conditions<br />
Potentially, although this site is unlikely to have<br />
been prioritised for investigation under the<br />
Environmental Protection Act 1990.<br />
<strong>Renfrewshire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> have confirmed that no<br />
sites have been statutorily designated as Part<br />
IIA Section 78(2) sites. It was noted that this<br />
does not necessarily preclude the possibility of<br />
contamination with the site boundary.<br />
No specific information is held for the subject<br />
site.<br />
A brief phase one report (desk top study) was<br />
conducted by Goodson Associates (Jan 2002)<br />
Subject of this report<br />
The developer has initiated the site<br />
investigation process through the preparation of<br />
this preliminary investigation report