lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of domestic violence based on the definition in the New Zealand Domestic<br />
Violence Act 1995.<br />
3.76 Another group argued for an approach <strong>to</strong> domestic violence which may include<br />
‘physical, sexual, emotional or financial abuse’. They stressed that concentration<br />
on the purely physical can lead <strong>to</strong> a failure <strong>to</strong> understand the position in which<br />
vulnerable people may find themselves.<br />
3.77 In considering the impact of the law of provocation in the context of domestic<br />
violence, our approach remains as stated in Consultation Paper No 173: 48<br />
Domestic violence is an extremely worrying problem. The law must<br />
deal with it in a way which is fair and shows proper respect for<br />
human life. At the same time it would be wrong <strong>to</strong> introduce special<br />
rules relating <strong>to</strong> domestic killings unless there is medical or other<br />
evidence which demonstrates a need and a proper basis on which<br />
<strong>to</strong> do so.<br />
3.78 As a matter of principle, the criminal law should be gender neutral unless it is<br />
absolutely necessary <strong>to</strong> depart from that principle. Our proposals do not depart<br />
from that principle. Our provisional conclusions have received a considerable<br />
degree of support from those women’s groups who have commented on them. 49<br />
“Gross Provocation” need not involve a risk of physical violence<br />
3.79 Turning <strong>to</strong> cases other than domestic violence, we would not want <strong>to</strong> narrow the<br />
law of provocation as it currently affects householders. There is undoubtedly a<br />
very strongly held view among many members of the public that the law is<br />
wrongly balanced as between householders and burglars. 50 We think that much<br />
of the public anxiety is possibly based on a misunderstanding of the present law<br />
and of the highly unusual facts of the Tony Martin case. However, we do accept<br />
that many members of the public are genuinely worried about what may happen<br />
<strong>to</strong> them if they use force against intruders and are subsequently judged <strong>to</strong> have<br />
gone <strong>to</strong>o far. Sometimes burglaries involve the most vile acts of desecration of a<br />
person’s home and of belongings which may be cherished for highly personal<br />
reasons. If, for example, a householder confronted a burglar responsible for such<br />
behaviour and immediately attacked him, causing fatal injury, we think that it<br />
would be a harsh law which precluded the jury from considering provocation and<br />
we doubt whether such a law would command public support or respect.<br />
48 Para 1.67.<br />
49 Association of Women Barristers; Justice for Women (but who prefer the majority view in<br />
Smith (Morgan)); Refuge (but who would like <strong>to</strong> see inclusion of a partial defence<br />
comprising realistic fear of serious harm or death coupled with extreme emotional<br />
distress); Rights of Women (but who would like <strong>to</strong> have a definition of domestic violence<br />
enshrined in English law).<br />
50 When a BBC radio programme recently invited listeners <strong>to</strong> send in their suggestions for a<br />
new law on any subject, the proposal which received the greatest number of votes was <strong>to</strong><br />
legitimise any use of force by householders <strong>to</strong>wards burglars. See further<br />
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/<strong>to</strong>day/.<br />
49