lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
lc290 Partial Defences to Murder report - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PART 4<br />
EXCESSIVE FORCE IN SELF-DEFENCE<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
4.1 In Consultation Paper No 173 1 we presented the arguments for and against the<br />
development of a new partial defence of excessive force in self-defence. We<br />
asked consultees <strong>to</strong> consider two distinct options. One (option A) involved the<br />
extension of the common law defence of self-defence so as <strong>to</strong> provide a partial<br />
defence in circumstances where some force by the defendant, based on the<br />
defendant’s subjective belief, was lawful but the amount of force used exceeded<br />
that which was reasonable. That option was limited <strong>to</strong> the defence of the person<br />
or another. The second (option C) involved the pre-emptive use of force in selfdefence<br />
of the person or another in a situation where any use of force is<br />
presently unlawful because it would be in response <strong>to</strong> a threat of violence<br />
insufficiently imminent <strong>to</strong> give rise <strong>to</strong> the defence of self-defence. We consulted<br />
about two other options, B and D, which involved extending A and C respectively<br />
<strong>to</strong> include defence of property.<br />
4.2 Only 12 consultees stated a preference for any form of partial defence of<br />
excessive force in self-defence being applicable <strong>to</strong> the defence of property. Of<br />
those, only two favoured option D.<br />
4.3 The creation of a partial defence <strong>to</strong> murder based on excessive use of force in<br />
self-defence has been the subject of previous recommendations by the Criminal<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Revision Committee, 2 a House of Lords Select Committee 3 and the <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong>. Clause 59 of the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s draft Criminal Code 4 would<br />
provide a partial defence <strong>to</strong> murder reflecting option B. 5 It claimed support, as a<br />
1 See Part IX and paras 12.84 – 12.94.<br />
2 Fourteenth Report: Offences Against the Person (1980) Cmnd 7844, para 288.<br />
3 Report of the Select Committee on <strong>Murder</strong> and Life Imprisonment, (1988-89) HL 78-I, para<br />
89.<br />
4 <strong>Law</strong> Com No 177.<br />
5 Clause 59 provides:<br />
A person who but for this section would be guilty of murder is not guilty of<br />
murder if, at the time of his act, he believes the use of force which causes<br />
death <strong>to</strong> be necessary and reasonable <strong>to</strong> effect a purpose referred <strong>to</strong> in section<br />
44 (use of force referred <strong>to</strong> in public or private defence) but the force exceeds<br />
that which is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances which exist or<br />
(where there is a difference) in those which he believes <strong>to</strong> exist.<br />
Clause 44(1) provides:<br />
A person does not commit an offence by using such force as, in the<br />
circumstances which exist or which he believes <strong>to</strong> exist, is immediately<br />
necessary and reasonable –<br />
(a) <strong>to</strong> prevent or terminate crime, or <strong>to</strong> effect or assist in the lawful arrest of<br />
an offender or suspected offender or of a person unlawfully at large;<br />
(b) <strong>to</strong> prevent or terminate a breach of the peace;<br />
72