15.08.2013 Views

NOx Emissions Impacts from Widespread Deployment of CHP in ...

NOx Emissions Impacts from Widespread Deployment of CHP in ...

NOx Emissions Impacts from Widespread Deployment of CHP in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NOx</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong> Report<br />

3. Replacement <strong>of</strong> grid power with <strong>CHP</strong> electricity reduces <strong>NOx</strong> at the utility power<br />

plant, because <strong>CHP</strong> generated electricity produces far less <strong>NOx</strong> emissions than do<br />

most utility power plants<br />

4. <strong>CHP</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ates losses aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>from</strong> the transmission and distribution <strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

otherwise produced by central station generators and delivered via the grid.<br />

This study estimates the potential <strong>NOx</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>from</strong> widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial and commercial facilities across the eight-county HGB region. As shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table ES-1, <strong>NOx</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs are estimated to be <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 12.9 - 14.9 tons per day with<br />

about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the reduction aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>from</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector. By 2020, economic<br />

and population growth <strong>in</strong> HGB is anticipated to create opportunities for further<br />

deployment <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong> systems, which would likely result <strong>in</strong> even greater <strong>NOx</strong> reductions.<br />

Table ES-1: Potential <strong>NOx</strong> Reductions <strong>in</strong> HGB <strong>from</strong> <strong>CHP</strong><br />

<strong>CHP</strong> Systems<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

(tons/day)<br />

Peak Ozone<br />

Season<br />

(tons/day)<br />

Commercial Sector 2.9 – 4.9 5 - 9<br />

Industrial Sector 10.0 11.7<br />

Total HGB 12.9 – 14.9 17 - 21<br />

While implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong> reduces total <strong>NOx</strong> emissions, it also shifts the location <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>NOx</strong> emissions. Whereas the conventional approach would primarily result <strong>in</strong> <strong>NOx</strong><br />

emissions at the utility power plants, which are located mostly outside <strong>of</strong> the eight county<br />

region, use <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong> would relocate some <strong>of</strong> those emissions to those facilities adopt<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

use. Thus, the geographical distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>NOx</strong> emissions is changed through <strong>CHP</strong><br />

implementation. For HGB, this could mean that <strong>NOx</strong> emissions with<strong>in</strong> the eight-county<br />

region could <strong>in</strong>crease, even though overall <strong>NOx</strong> emissions are reduced.<br />

The actual impacts on the HGB region <strong>from</strong> <strong>NOx</strong> produced by utility power plants are<br />

the key to assess<strong>in</strong>g the overall <strong>NOx</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong>. The extent to which <strong>NOx</strong> emission<br />

reductions result<strong>in</strong>g at utility power plants have a direct impact on lower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>NOx</strong> and<br />

ozone concentrations <strong>in</strong> HGB determ<strong>in</strong>es the overall benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>CHP</strong>. As shown <strong>in</strong> the<br />

figure below, this study suggests that <strong>CHP</strong> provides a net <strong>NOx</strong> benefit to HGB if more<br />

viii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!