Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy - DTU Orbit
Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy - DTU Orbit
Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy - DTU Orbit
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5. Discussion<br />
5.1. Separation <strong>of</strong> humic substance associated 129 I<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> modified sequential extraction procedures originally<br />
proposed by Tessier (1979) has been reported and applied <strong>for</strong><br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> association <strong>of</strong> 129 I in different components in soil<br />
and sediment samples (Englund et al., 2010; Hou et al., 2003;<br />
Schmidtz and Aumann, 1995). However, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se procedures<br />
allow identifying humic acid, fulvic acid and humin associated 129 I.<br />
Organic matter likely plays a major role in <strong>the</strong> geochemical cycle <strong>of</strong><br />
iodine and thus <strong>the</strong> organic <strong>for</strong>m that iodine may be associated<br />
with, will highly influence <strong>the</strong> mobility and availability <strong>of</strong> this<br />
element in soil and sediment. It is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e important to design<br />
operationally defined speciation experiments so that <strong>the</strong> organic<br />
matter fractions can be investigated separately.<br />
The isolation <strong>of</strong> humic substances from soil and sediment is<br />
normally implemented by extraction with alkaline solution, <strong>for</strong><br />
example NaOH (Simpson and Johnson, 2006; Gonzalez-Vila and<br />
Martin, 1985), mild extractants such as sodium pyrophosphate<br />
(Hutta and Gora, 2003), or a mixture <strong>of</strong> pyrophosphate and NaOH<br />
(Tonelli et al., 1997; Ceccanti et al., 1986) at different conditions.<br />
Moreover, an extraction time <strong>of</strong> more than 12 h (Gonzalez-Vila<br />
and Martin, 1985) is normally applied when using alkaline<br />
extraction (NaOH), and a low extraction yield <strong>of</strong> humic<br />
substances was obtained when mild extractants were applied<br />
(Stevenson, 1994; Shirshova, 1991) comparing with alkaline<br />
extraction.<br />
In order to investigate <strong>the</strong> isolation <strong>of</strong> iodine bound to humic<br />
substances in soil and <strong>the</strong> optimal leaching time <strong>of</strong> this fraction,<br />
two different extractants were used in this work. The iodine bound<br />
to humic substance from Danish soil was extracted with 5% TMAH<br />
<strong>for</strong> 4 h and with 0.1 M NaOH <strong>for</strong> 12 h at room temperature, under<br />
V. Hansen et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental Radioactivity xxx (2011) 1e9 5<br />
Fig. 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> 129 I/ 127 I atomic ratios in <strong>the</strong> anoxic and oxic marine sediment, soil Denmark and IAEA-375 soil.<br />
stirring. The total concentration <strong>of</strong> 127 I (3.98 mg/g sample) was<br />
obtained through <strong>the</strong> combustion method and ICP-MS measurement<br />
(see 3.2.1). The concentration <strong>of</strong> 127 I in <strong>the</strong> leachate was<br />
directly measured by ICP-MS and <strong>the</strong> results show a slightly higher<br />
amount (53% <strong>of</strong> total 127 I) in <strong>the</strong> leachate <strong>of</strong> 5% TMAH compared to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> 0.1 M NaOH which gave a value <strong>of</strong> 42%.<br />
The humic substances in soils and sediments arise from <strong>the</strong><br />
chemical and biological decomposition <strong>of</strong> plants and animal residues.<br />
Several studies (Schlegel et al., 2006; Reiller et al., 2006)<br />
effectuated on soils and marine sediments showed that <strong>the</strong> iodine<br />
is covalently bonded to humic and fulvic acid extracted from soil<br />
and sediments.<br />
Oxidation and hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> humic substances may occur while<br />
leaching with basic extractants and thus <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> iodine can be<br />
expected. Possible loss <strong>of</strong> iodine from humic acid during <strong>the</strong><br />
leaching process due to <strong>the</strong> 5% TMAH was investigated. Humic acid<br />
(HA) extracted from soil/sediments and HA purchased from Sigma<br />
Aldrich was labeled with 125 I via electrophilic substitution using<br />
ChloramineeT. Following <strong>the</strong> labeling procedure, <strong>the</strong> iodine were<br />
covalently bonded to humic acid (Lassen and Carlsen, 1994). The<br />
recovery <strong>of</strong> 125 I in <strong>the</strong> humic acid after labeling was 98e99%. The<br />
labeled HA was <strong>the</strong>n mixed with 5% <strong>of</strong> TMAH and stirred <strong>for</strong> 30 min.<br />
After precipitation <strong>of</strong> HA and centrifugation, <strong>the</strong> 125 I recovery in <strong>the</strong><br />
125 IHA were 95e99%. This result indicates that <strong>the</strong>re is no significant<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> 129 I when 5% TMAH is used to extract <strong>the</strong> organic<br />
matter. Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> organic iodine determined in soil<br />
samples by sequential extraction (using basic extractant) were<br />
consistent with <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> XANES (Kodama et al., 2006;<br />
Shimamoto et al., 2011).<br />
The excellent recovery and short extraction time (4 h) using 5%<br />
TMAH compared with using NaOH (12 h), favors <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> this<br />
reagent to isolate <strong>the</strong> iodine bound to organic matter from <strong>the</strong><br />
studied samples.<br />
Please cite this article in press as: Hansen, V., et al., Partition <strong>of</strong> iodine ( 129 I and 127 I) isotopes in soils and marine sediments, Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Radioactivity (2011), doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.07.005