- Page 1 and 2: University of Leoben Dissertation I
- Page 3: To my family
- Page 7: Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 11 and 12: Non quia difficilia sunt non audemu
- Page 13 and 14: Contents Affidavit V Acknowledgemen
- Page 15 and 16: Contents E Mechanics of Residually
- Page 17 and 18: 1.1 Why Coatings? 1 Introduction Su
- Page 19 and 20: 1.2 Fabrication Processes of Thin F
- Page 21 and 22: components are discussed subsequent
- Page 23 and 24: 1.3.3 Friction and Wear 1.3 Origin
- Page 25 and 26: 1.4 Methods for Film Stress Measure
- Page 27 and 28: 1.4 Methods for Film Stress Measure
- Page 29 and 30: 1.4 Methods for Film Stress Measure
- Page 31 and 32: 1.5 Fracture Mechanics of Thin Film
- Page 33 and 34: Cantilever Beam Deflection Method 1
- Page 35 and 36: 1.5 Fracture Mechanics of Thin Film
- Page 37 and 38: Bibliography [1] Freund LB, Suresh
- Page 39 and 40: Aim of the Dissertation The aim of
- Page 41 and 42: Summary The main task of this disse
- Page 43 and 44: involved, the incident angle, the i
- Page 45 and 46: a new method that allows the straig
- Page 47 and 48: 2 List of appended papers Paper A S
- Page 49 and 50: A A Direct Method of Determining Co
- Page 51 and 52: A.3 Experimental 840nm PVD-deposite
- Page 53 and 54: A.4 Calculation Procedure and Resul
- Page 55 and 56: A.4 Calculation Procedure and Resul
- Page 57 and 58: A.4 Calculation Procedure and Resul
- Page 59 and 60:
A.4 Calculation Procedure and Resul
- Page 61 and 62:
A.5 Remarks on the Determined Stres
- Page 63 and 64:
A.5 Remarks on the Determined Stres
- Page 65 and 66:
A.6 Discussion of Possible Sources
- Page 67 and 68:
Bibliography to paper A [1] Eiper E
- Page 69 and 70:
B Stress Measurement in Thin Films
- Page 71 and 72:
B.2 Brief Description of the ILR Me
- Page 73 and 74:
B.3 Discussion of Sources of Error
- Page 75 and 76:
B.3.3 Accuracy of SEM Measurements
- Page 77 and 78:
B.4 Experimental Design to Minimize
- Page 79 and 80:
B.4 Experimental Design to Minimize
- Page 81 and 82:
B.4 Experimental Design to Minimize
- Page 83 and 84:
B.5 Determination of Young’s Modu
- Page 85 and 86:
[1] Massl S, Keckes J, Pippan R, Ac
- Page 87 and 88:
C A New Cantilever Technique Reveal
- Page 89 and 90:
C.2 Experimental curved, which assu
- Page 91 and 92:
C.2 Experimental of residual stress
- Page 93 and 94:
C.3 Discussion and Concluding Remar
- Page 95 and 96:
[1] Nix WD. Metall Trans A 1989;20A
- Page 97 and 98:
D Investigation of Fracture Propert
- Page 99 and 100:
D.2 Experimental the bias voltage w
- Page 101 and 102:
D.2 Experimental Table D.1: The com
- Page 103 and 104:
D.3 Results Figure D.5: SEM picture
- Page 105 and 106:
D.4 Discussion Table D.3: Deflectio
- Page 107 and 108:
D.4 Discussion strength with. Kamiy
- Page 109 and 110:
D.5 Conclusion stresses, which disa
- Page 111 and 112:
Bibliography to paper D [1] Weppelm
- Page 113 and 114:
Bibliography to paper D [44] Ziegle
- Page 115 and 116:
E Mechanics of Residually Stressed
- Page 117 and 118:
E.2 Sign Convention Figure E.1: Ini
- Page 119 and 120:
E.4 Calculation of the Normal Stres
- Page 121 and 122:
E.5 Determination of the Position o
- Page 123 and 124:
E.6 Moment Balance Figure E.5: Forc
- Page 125 and 126:
E.8 Correlation of the Stresses in
- Page 127 and 128:
E.9 An Example: Depth Profile of Re