Untitled - UF-Facilities Planning & Construction - University of Florida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

University of Florida BIM Guidelines and Standards Never explode 2D CAD files within a Revit file. Pin position of linked file. 1.9.2.2.9. 3D model linking protocols The Design Team BIM Manager shall establish protocols for 3D Model linking, otherwise the following protocols are suggested for use by the team; Set reference links from the link management menu to Overlay. Create an individual Workset for each Revit Model linked into the Project. Workset Naming & Use Conventions (above) for additional information. Use the Specify Worksets option when linking 3D models. Only open the Worksets needed for model collaboration. Close Worksets: Grids and Levels, (All) Link-…, Scope Boxes, and other Worksets containing information not required for model collaboration. Use the Positioning: Auto - Origin to Origin option when linking 3D models. Pin position of linked file. 1.9.2.2.10. Custom Parameter definitions The Design Team BIM Manager shall audit and monitor the use of custom parameters introduced into the model environment for consistency of naming schema and avoidance of duplication. Shared parameter files shall be properly organized and included when file transfers occur. 1.9.2.2.11. Family creation and type Catalog file management Family creation shall be consistent with the Level of Development (LOD) Matrix in which the component is being utilized. Refer to Section 1.9.3. below for LOD by phase. Type catalogs shall be fully developed and properly populated with the associated data elements necessary for family functionality. 1.9.3. Modeling Plan 1.9.3.1. Modeling Plan Overview It is the owners (UF) understanding that with such a broad range of costs and scale for minor projects, multiple project types will exist requiring varying degrees of document development, BIM model content, and complexity of creation. Specific examples are as indicated below; 1.9.3.1.1. New Building/Addition This scale typically involves a stand-alone new building or major addition having a construction cost under the $2,000,000 threshold for minor projects. It is the owner’s (UF) requirement that projects of this magnitude be fully documented in BIM in a manner similar to UF major projects, comprehensively utilizing the tools and BIM Execution Plan- UF Minor Projects Template UF-000 14 of 20 pages
University of Florida BIM Guidelines and Standards methodologies as specified herein this BIM Execution Plan. Although UF minor projects presently are not required to have an approved Facility program, the design team will be expected to follow the SUS/UF design guidelines for space standards. To facilitate this process, the owner will provide a Revit template which includes the required space standards and coding schemas for use by the designer. Completion of the template will be a required deliverable at DD and 100%CD phases. 1.9.3.1.2. Large Scale Minor This scale typically involves larger scale minor renovation/remodeling, or utility infrastructure projects having a construction cost greater than $100,000 with work scope including demolition and construction of architectural, structural, and MEP building elements. Design documents shall be developed in BIM in a manner consistent with the protocols as indicated in this BIM Execution Plan document. It is understood that routinely, renovation and remodeling projects may require substantial demolition plans. Architectural elements shall be modeled with demolition depicted by use of the Revit “Phases” functionality whenever possible. A considerable number of UF buildings were either originally modeled in BIM or have BIM Architectural models developed from the conversion of 2D CAD drawings. These will be made available by the owner for applicable buildings to facilitate the design effort. For buildings that do not have existing as-built MEP BIM models, design requiring considerable demolition of MEP elements such as equipment, piping, ductwork, electrical, etc., use of the Revit detail lines functionality is acceptable over modeling existing elements to be demolished. All “new” MEP (equipment, systems, piping, electrical, etc.) shall be modeled using the core Revit functionality for creation of those elements, be modeled suitable for coordination and clash detection, and conform to the agreed upon LOD table developed by the project team. 1.9.3.1.3. Small Scale Minor This scale typically involves smaller scale minor renovation/remodeling, or utility infrastructure projects having a construction cost less than $100,000 with work scope including limited demolition and construction of architectural, structural, MEP building elements, and cosmetic finishes. When available, the owner’s architectural BIM models will be provided to facilitate the design process. For buildings that do not have existing as-built MEP BIM models, liberal use of the Revit detail lines functionality is acceptable for minor demolition and plan view documentation of architectural and MEP elements such as equipment, piping, ductwork, electrical, etc. All “new” MEP equipment and/or systems that will require turn over of operations and maintenance documentation to the owner shall be modeled in BIM. 1.9.3.2. Level of Development by Project Phase A detailed modeling plan shall be developed for each phase of the project and shall clearly describe the desired model maturity and “Level of Development” (LOD) necessary for the various phases of project design. BIM Execution Plan- UF Minor Projects Template UF-000 15 of 20 pages
Page 2 and 3: University of Florida BIM Guideline
Page 20: University of Florida BIM Guideline

Untitled - UF-Facilities Planning & Construction - University of Florida

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?