Minimality Effects in Syntax · The MLC and Derivational Economy ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

120 Gisbert Fanselow Comorovski, I. 1996 Interrogative Phrases and the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dayal, Veneeta 2003 Multiple wh-questions. Case 66, The Syntax Companion. Diesing, Molly 1992 Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT-Press. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi 1997 The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge, Cambridge UP. Fanselow, Gisbert 1998 Minimal Link Effects in German (and Other Languages). Paper, presented at the 1998 MLC conference, Potsdam. 2001 Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 3. Fanselow, Gisbert and Anoop Mahajan 2000 Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying, and successive cyclicity. In: Wh-scope marking, Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow (eds). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Featherston, Sam 2002a Grammaticality and Universals. Wh-constraints in German. to appear in Linguistics. 2002b Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax.: some whconstraints in German. Ms., Tübingen. Fodor, Janet Dean 1978 Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 427–473. Frazier, Lyn and Giovanni Flores d’Arcais 1989 Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 331–344. Golan, Yael 1993 Node crossing economy, superiority and D-linking. Ms., Tel Aviv University. Grewendorf, Günther 1999 The additional-wh effect and multiple wh-fronting. In: Specifiers, D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett and G. Tsoulas (eds.), 146–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 Multiple wh-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 87–122. Haider, Hubert 1986 Deutsche Syntax – Generativ. Habilitation thesis. Vienna. 1990 Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax. In: Scrambling and Barriers. Günter Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), 93–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1993 Deutsche Syntax-generativ. Tübingen: Narr. 1997 Economy in syntax is projective economy. In; The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gärtner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), 205–226. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
The MLC and derivational economy 121 2000 Superiority Revisited – Dutch, English, German, Icelandic Contrasts. A representational account. Ms., University of Salzburg. This vol. The Superiority Conspiracy – Four Constraints and a Processing Effect. Halle, Morris 1992 Latvian declension. In Yearbook of Morphology Geert Booij and Jaap van der Marle (eds.), 33–47. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz 1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Ken Hale and S. Jay Keyser (eds.), 111–176. MIT Press, Cambridge. 1994 Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In MITWPL 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology. Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley (eds.), 275–288. MIT Press, Cambridge. Hemforth, Barbara 1993 Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung sprachlichen Wissens. Sankt Augustin: Infix. Hendrik, R. & Michael Rochemont 1982 Complementation, multiple wh, and echo questions. Ms., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C. and University of California, Irvine, California. Hestvik. Arild 1986 Case Theory and Norwegian Impersonal Constructions: Subjekt- Object Alternations in Active and Passive Verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9: 181–197. Hoge, Kerstin 2000 Superiority. Doctoral dissertation. Oxford. Hornstein, Norbert 1995 Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. Huang, James T. 1982 Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Kayne, Richard 1983 Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 223–249. Kitahara, Hisatsugu 1993 Deducing ‘superiority’ effects from the Shortest Chain Requirement. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 109–119. Kitahara, Hisatsugu 1994 Target α. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Krems, Josef 1984 Erwartungsgeleitete Sprachverarbeitung. Frankfurt/Main: Lang. Kuno, Susumo and J. Robinson 1972 Multiple wh-questions. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 463–487. Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito 1992 Move a: Conditions on its Application and Output, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Page 1 and 2: The MLC and Derivational Economy Gi
Page 3 and 4: Independent of whether such a facto
Page 5 and 6: Penka Stateva, my second Bulgarian
Page 7 and 8: The MLC and derivational economy 79
Page 9 and 10: (12) constitute further evidence fo
Page 11 and 12: (18) Missing superiority effect for
Page 13 and 14: (22) Missing Adjunct Effects in OV-
Page 17 and 18: For example, Swedish respects the n
Page 21 and 22: (33a) and the locality requirements
Page 23 and 24: The key to an understanding of this
Page 25 and 26: (44) MLC: Liberal Version α cannot
Page 27 and 28: oft ‘often’, i.e., it precedes
Page 29 and 30: Such an analysis is not convincing,
Page 37 and 38: (63) Restricted liberalization of s
Page 39 and 40: (65) Multiple questions in Yiddish
Page 41 and 42: (70) Non-referential subjects in wh
Page 43 and 44: The absence of a contrast between (
Page 45 and 46: Similarly, noun phrases with an obl
Page 47: References The MLC and derivational
Page 51: The MLC and derivational economy 12

Minimality Effects in Syntax · The MLC and Derivational Economy ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?