Community-based Sectors for the New England Groundfish Fishery
Community-based Sectors for the New England Groundfish Fishery
Community-based Sectors for the New England Groundfish Fishery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Under current sector regulations, sectors can not buy, sell or trade ACE with o<strong>the</strong>r sectors. They<br />
must constrain <strong>the</strong>ir catch of all species <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y have sector allocations to those annual<br />
allocations. If more sectors are authorized, substantial gains in profitability <strong>for</strong> sectors may be<br />
realized by allowing sectors to trade ACE.<br />
There are some communities, such as some in Downeast Maine, that had traditionally had some<br />
involvement in <strong>the</strong> groundfish fishery, but no longer have any fishermen with permits with “A”<br />
DAS and catch history. <strong>Sectors</strong> in conjunction with permit banks could provide an opportunity<br />
<strong>for</strong> permit owners and communities without “A” DAS and catch history to reenter <strong>the</strong> groundfish<br />
fishery. Individuals that hold groundfish permits with only “C” DAS could enter a sector without<br />
purchasing a new permit and could have access to that sector’s allocation. A sector could be<br />
created with a permit bank to acquire catch history <strong>for</strong> this purpose.<br />
In sum, although <strong>the</strong>re has not been an explicit program to facilitate development of community<strong>based</strong><br />
sectors, <strong>the</strong> opportunity exists to do so and a number of <strong>the</strong>m are likely to evolve in <strong>the</strong><br />
coming years. These community-<strong>based</strong> sectors can serve dual goals of improving <strong>the</strong> profitability<br />
and safety of groundfish fishermen and also allowing communities to retain or regain <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
involvement in <strong>the</strong> groundfish fishery. However, <strong>the</strong>re a number of barriers that are impeding<br />
development of community-<strong>based</strong> sectors and fuller utilization of sector management in general.<br />
Listed below are a number of recommendations that may facilitate more effective use of sectors<br />
by fishermen and communities. These include actions that could be taken by NMFS<br />
independently, regulatory re<strong>for</strong>ms that may be included by <strong>the</strong> Council in Amendment 16, and<br />
creation of new financing program that would require federal legislation:<br />
Recommendations<br />
1. To facilitate individual permit holders’ evaluation of <strong>the</strong>ir decision of whe<strong>the</strong>r to join a<br />
sector, NMFS should compile <strong>the</strong> catch histories by fish stock of all permitted groundfish<br />
vessels and in<strong>for</strong>m all current permit owners of <strong>the</strong> process of acquiring <strong>the</strong>ir catch history<br />
and <strong>the</strong> specific <strong>for</strong>ms and signatures required <strong>for</strong> release of <strong>the</strong>ir catch history to <strong>the</strong>m and to<br />
a sector organizer and or sector manager.<br />
2. The NEFMC should authorize a streamlined process <strong>for</strong> sector approval that does not require<br />
a Council framework action and reduces <strong>the</strong> burden of documentation and regulatory analysis<br />
that must be done by sector organizers.<br />
3. The NEFMC should allow sectors to trade some proportion of <strong>the</strong>ir ACE allocations with<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r sectors within <strong>the</strong> fishing year to facilitate catch balancing and greater utilization of<br />
ACE portfolios.<br />
4. The NEFMC should fix <strong>the</strong> allocation baseline <strong>for</strong> determining individual permit holders’<br />
contributions to sector allocations and decide how overall sector allocations are adjusted with<br />
movement of individuals in, out and between sectors. Future catch privileges associated with<br />
individual permits, whe<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> context of sectors or o<strong>the</strong>r management systems, should be<br />
unaffected by how catch privileges are utilized within sectors.<br />
5. The NEFMC should explicitly authorize community-<strong>based</strong> sectors to <strong>for</strong>m permit banks that<br />
can hold permits and contribute catch history to <strong>the</strong> sector. This recommendation is not meant<br />
to imply that multiple permits from a single vessel could be split.<br />
6. Congress should create financial resources <strong>for</strong> development of community permit<br />
banks through a loan guarantee program or a direct loan program modeled on <strong>the</strong><br />
industry funded buyback structure.<br />
6