16.11.2013 Views

corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ...

corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ...

corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.2 Increased Housing Diversity Areas and Urban Consolidation<br />

The demographic analysis reveals that Corio and Norlane have experienced modest<br />

population decline over the last 20 years and without future intervention marginal<br />

population growth is predicted to occur. Achieving a greater mix <strong>of</strong> quality high and<br />

medium housing density is critical to urban renewal <strong>of</strong> the study area.<br />

Land within and surrounding the Corio Village Shopping Centre and the Bell Post<br />

Shopping Centre is identified for increased housing diversity in accordance with the<br />

<strong>Greater</strong> Geelong Planning Scheme Incorporated Document: Key Development and<br />

Increased Housing Diversity Areas, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greater</strong> Geelong, July 2009. These<br />

increased housing diversity areas are shown in Map 8.<br />

The policy context regarding increased housing diversity areas was noted earlier in<br />

section 2.1.10 and is supported in the local policy section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Greater</strong> Geelong<br />

Planning Scheme, particularly at Clause 21.06 Settlement and Housing.<br />

Extensive areas <strong>of</strong> Corio and Norlane are zoned Residential 1 and sit outside land<br />

identified for increased housing diversity. Urban consolidation is supported in these<br />

areas however greater consideration must be given to responding to the existing<br />

neighbourhood character. There is also an expectation that the development density <strong>of</strong><br />

new development would be <strong>of</strong> a lower scale than in areas identified for increased<br />

housing diversity.<br />

There is some conflict between policy objectives that encourage a greater mix <strong>of</strong> high<br />

and medium housing density and objectives for respecting neighbourhood character.<br />

Clause 21.06-4 outlines strategies to address this tension. Relevant strategies include:<br />

• Ensure that development is responsive to the established character <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

• Acknowledge that neighbourhood character in the Increased Housing Diversity<br />

Areas … will adapt and evolve over time, particularly within and on the edges <strong>of</strong><br />

activity centres, where land use and development will intensify.<br />

• Retain existing vegetation wherever possible, particularly vegetation that contributes<br />

to the municipality’s tree canopy.<br />

In refusing a proposed multi-unit development at 12-20 Fairbairn Drive, Corio (to the<br />

rear <strong>of</strong> the Aldi store), the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal made critical<br />

findings with regard to respecting neighbourhood character at paragraphs 31 and 32<br />

(TGM Group v <strong>Greater</strong> Geelong CC [2010] VCAT 1672 (12 October 2010)):<br />

“I accept that the proposed two storey scale is reasonable, notwithstanding that<br />

dwellings in the neighbourhood are all single storey. The Design Guidelines for the Corio<br />

3 precinct acknowledge that it is generally acceptable for new buildings to exceed the<br />

predominant building height by one storey.<br />

Given the scale <strong>of</strong> the proposed development, and its intensity across the site, I believe<br />

it is imperative that it makes a contribution to the streetscape or public realm. I consider<br />

that the proposal fails in that regard. The orientation <strong>of</strong> the dwellings, and their overall<br />

presentation to the street, is entirely unacceptable. Rather than addressing the street<br />

and the public realm, the units at the end <strong>of</strong> both Blocks A & B present their side (west)<br />

elevations to the street, with limited fenestration. In that regard the layout is<br />

fundamentally at odds with Clause 55.02-5 (Integration with the street), which calls for<br />

development to be oriented to front existing streets”.<br />

Corio Norlane Structure Plan<br />

Background Report - 57 - Final - March 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!