19.12.2013 Views

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> <strong>Ecoregional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: Chapter 1 – Background & Analysis Process<br />

For example, Mangrove forests are generally transitional between terrestrial and<br />

mar<strong>in</strong>e/brackish environments and their ecology is greatly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the substrate <strong>of</strong><br />

sediment build up, rather than the underly<strong>in</strong>g RePPProT landforms. There is, however, a<br />

noted area <strong>of</strong> exception to this, namely, the Mangroves that grow directly on top <strong>of</strong> limestone<br />

substrate <strong>in</strong> a small bay and its enclosed island on the northern coastl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the Sangkulirang<br />

pen<strong>in</strong>sula. Such unique areas, identified to the ECA team by experts, were automatically<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the proposed portfolio as deserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> further conservation attention s<strong>in</strong>ce it is<br />

likely they also harbor unusual plants and/or animals as well.<br />

To capture more <strong>of</strong> the landscape heterogeneity, the portfolio <strong>of</strong> conservation sites selected<br />

will also conta<strong>in</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> all possible comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> target ecological system<br />

types – as well as the important RePPProT land system types. Most importantly, though, only<br />

the target system- and not the RePPProT types- will be the <strong>in</strong>itial basis <strong>of</strong> assembl<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

portfolio <strong>of</strong> sites. The landscape unit will be used as a secondary filter for check<strong>in</strong>g<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> each target.<br />

At the completion <strong>of</strong> the assembly phase, RePPProT types that have not been represented<br />

will be sought and added to the portfolio where possible. This approach is very similar to the<br />

TNC-US methodology <strong>of</strong> employ<strong>in</strong>g Ecological Land Units analysis to <strong>in</strong>corporate either <strong>in</strong><br />

the selection <strong>of</strong> ecoregional portfolios up front, or, as we did, to use the <strong>in</strong>formation to crosscheck<br />

the selected portfolio for under-represented heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> these geomorphic factors.<br />

It can be argued that either case <strong>in</strong>sures that more subtle landscape variations, which plant<br />

and animal species <strong>of</strong>ten key on, are <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the recommended conservation<br />

portfolio.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>e-Filter Targets: Five Important Animal Species<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> five important wildlife species (Sun Bear, Orangutan, Bornean Gibbon,<br />

Mahakam River Dolph<strong>in</strong>, and Proboscis Monkey) (see Figure G) with<strong>in</strong> potential portfolio<br />

sites <strong>in</strong> each stratigraphic unit was also assessed. These species were selected for one or<br />

more <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons:<br />

- large body size or vocally dist<strong>in</strong>ct, thereby easily detectable <strong>in</strong> the field (such as<br />

Gibbons)<br />

- wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g habits spann<strong>in</strong>g several <strong>of</strong> our target forest system types<br />

- presence at the top <strong>of</strong> their respective food webs<br />

- natural history <strong>in</strong>formation which suggests that the species require unfragmented<br />

blocks <strong>of</strong> habitat, and therefore their presence <strong>in</strong> substantial numbers or <strong>in</strong> stable<br />

family group<strong>in</strong>gs becomes a good <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> viable forest types.<br />

Clouded Leopard (Ne<strong>of</strong>elis nebulosa) was <strong>in</strong>itially considered <strong>in</strong> this assessment due to its<br />

globally-rare status, but was dropped when the ECA team concluded that virtually no recent,<br />

reliable occurrence or ecological <strong>in</strong>formation was available for this species. It is hoped that<br />

by captur<strong>in</strong>g the full array <strong>of</strong> target ecological system types <strong>in</strong> the ECA portfolio, particularly<br />

the Upper Montane and Cloud Forest types, essential habitat for this and other high pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!