19.12.2013 Views

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> <strong>Ecoregional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: Chapter 2 – Target Ecological Systems<br />

Occurrence Determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Significant Major Rivers and Lakes were identified first us<strong>in</strong>g LandSat imagery to locate<br />

them <strong>in</strong> the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The ECA team then consulted with <strong>in</strong>dividual experts<br />

and literature sources, followed by a ground or aerial check for those rivers proposed for<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> the portfolio.<br />

Major river systems <strong>in</strong> <strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this report as those hav<strong>in</strong>g complex<br />

deltas at their term<strong>in</strong>us, usually with Mangrove Forest or Freshwater Forest adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong>, this ECA recognized the follow<strong>in</strong>g 12 major river systems:<br />

Stratigraphic Unit 1 Stratigraphic Unit 3<br />

Sungai Sebuku<br />

Sungai K<strong>in</strong>jau<br />

Sungai Sembakung<br />

Sungai Belayan<br />

Sungai Sesayap<br />

Sungai Mahakam<br />

Sungai Kayan<br />

Stratigraphic Unit 2 Stratigraphic Unit 4<br />

Sungai Segah<br />

Sungai Kerang<br />

Sungai Kelai<br />

Sungai Karangan<br />

Sungai Kedang Kepala<br />

Condition<br />

Condition <strong>of</strong> the above rivers was ranked based upon a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> three separate<br />

ranks assigned the major segments <strong>of</strong> the river system, namely the Upper Catchment Area,<br />

Mid-stream Buffer Zone, and the Term<strong>in</strong>al Delta. These <strong>in</strong>dividual segments were ranked<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly:<br />

Prime upper catchment area- identified by flow accumulation <strong>of</strong> the watershed and its<br />

polygon def<strong>in</strong>ed by an aggregation <strong>of</strong> the sub-watershed area boundaries. The condition was<br />

ranked as Very good, Good, Poor, or Very Poor.<br />

Mid stream buffer zone – identified as the belt zone with<strong>in</strong> 500 meters on either side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

river, ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to the same condition criteria used to rate the Lowland Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />

system. The conditions were ranked asVery good, Good, Poor, or Very Poor.<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>al Delta – identified as the forested area at the mouth <strong>of</strong> each river, usually def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by the zone <strong>of</strong> perennial <strong>in</strong>undation, and ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to the same condition rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

given Mangrove Swamp and Freshwater Swamp system types. The conditions were ranked<br />

as Very good, Good, Poor, or Very Poor.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!