19.12.2013 Views

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> <strong>Ecoregional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: Chapter 2 – Target Ecological Systems<br />

Proboscis Monkey (Nasalis larvatus )(Bennett 1988b). Wells et al. (1979) found that <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Malaysian State <strong>of</strong> Sarawak, a small area <strong>of</strong> Peat Swamp Forest had about half the species <strong>of</strong><br />

birds that were present <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>g matrix <strong>of</strong> lowland evergreen forest. The rivers<br />

dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these swamps are known to be very rich <strong>in</strong> species (Giesen 1990), although towards<br />

the center <strong>of</strong> the swamps these rivers tend to have impoverished fauna (MacK<strong>in</strong>non et al.<br />

1996).<br />

Unna Chokkal<strong>in</strong>gam (pers. com.) reports see<strong>in</strong>g a mother orangutan and her baby <strong>in</strong> a very<br />

damaged patch <strong>of</strong> Peat Swamp Forest, some 2 km from Desa Sab<strong>in</strong>tulung. She also reports<br />

‘numbers’ <strong>of</strong> orangutan nests near Loh Sakoh on the western side <strong>of</strong> the swamp on the<br />

Belayan River and <strong>in</strong> the center <strong>of</strong> the large unburned section peat swamp <strong>in</strong> the Belayan area<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that this forest type harbors some <strong>of</strong> the preferred food types for this important<br />

primate species that may no longer be found elsewhere <strong>in</strong> more typical forest habitat.<br />

Chokkal<strong>in</strong>gam et al. (2001) states that “Peatland trees and other flora appear to have played a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imal economic role historically <strong>in</strong> local livelihoods. The riparian areas were used for<br />

extraction <strong>of</strong> some timber, rattan and other forest products, as well as for swidden agriculture<br />

on flood clay soils (Richter 2000). In the peatlands, there was only limited harvest <strong>of</strong> some<br />

wood species such as Shorea balengeran for house construction and others for fuelwood.<br />

Harvest<strong>in</strong>g was limited to about 0.5 km distance <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g water bodies, which could be<br />

accessed by small boats <strong>in</strong> the flood season and from where logs could be floated out. There<br />

was also harvest <strong>of</strong> some res<strong>in</strong> prior to 1965. Thus there appears to have been very low<br />

direct value for the trees and other forest products available <strong>in</strong> the peatlands till recently. A<br />

new medium-density fiber mill <strong>in</strong> the area has now provided a market for small-diameter logs<br />

<strong>in</strong> some sections <strong>of</strong> the area”.<br />

Sch<strong>in</strong>dele et al. (1989) and H<strong>of</strong>fmann et al. (1999) state that large-scale fires occurred <strong>in</strong> the<br />

peatlands recently <strong>in</strong> the drought years <strong>of</strong> 1982/83 and 1997/98. Extreme drought conditions<br />

probably rendered the peat forests and peat itself susceptible to large-scale fires.<br />

Chokkal<strong>in</strong>gam et al. (2001) reported that fire use by locals <strong>in</strong> the peatland areas probably<br />

provided primary ignition sources for these large-scale fires. The fires <strong>of</strong> 1982/83 are said to<br />

have been patchy and simultaneous, suggest<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources, aris<strong>in</strong>g primarily from<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g activities for agriculture or fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> riparian areas and peatland edges and spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>to some peatland areas.<br />

Conservation issues and threats<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> Community Interest<br />

Local communities and migrants <strong>in</strong> these areas do not appear to value the trees and<br />

vegetative resources on peatlands very much and are primarily concerned with fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Chokkal<strong>in</strong>gam et al. 2001). Such absence <strong>of</strong> community <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

these forests is probably the major conservation concern as far as the long-term viability<br />

<strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g occurrences <strong>in</strong> this prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!