19.12.2013 Views

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

Ecoregional Assessment of Biological Diversity in East Kalimantan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Kalimantan</strong> <strong>Ecoregional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: Chapter 1 – Background & Analysis Process<br />

4). Landscape context<br />

Figure K: Isolation rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> karst forests<br />

a. Isolation<br />

Target ecological system occurrences that have<br />

others <strong>of</strong> the same type close-by are considered more<br />

viable because highly mobile species with large<br />

diurnal ranges, or those that have local seasonal<br />

migrations or seasonal shifts, could more easily<br />

utilize the occurrence if there is a close ‘stepp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stone’ <strong>of</strong> a similar habitat. These habitat types are<br />

also considered to have a greater chance <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

repopulated more rapidly by other similar habitat<br />

patches <strong>in</strong> the event they were burnt or otherwise<br />

damaged. Figure K shows the distances that were<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> Lowland Limestone<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>forest occurrences. Occurrences <strong>in</strong> the lowest<br />

quartile for area <strong>of</strong> that system type (i.e. smallest<br />

size) were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the rank<strong>in</strong>gs for distance<br />

to nearest like occurrence. This was one way to<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ate all the artifactual and/or assumed to be<br />

non-viable vestigial occurrences <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />

system types.<br />

b. Condition around a target ecological system<br />

occurrence<br />

The condition <strong>of</strong> forest with<strong>in</strong> a buffer zone, set at<br />

two (2) kilometers around the occurrence, was<br />

ranked by the same method established for <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

condition rank<strong>in</strong>g above. The width <strong>of</strong> this buffer<br />

zone was set somewhat arbitrarily, but is<br />

considered to be wide enough to reflect the habitat<br />

that would immediately impact an occurrence.<br />

Information from the management plan for Lore<br />

L<strong>in</strong>du National Park, Central Sulawesi (TNC 2002)<br />

for example, <strong>in</strong>dicates that there is little detectable<br />

human impact on forests that are more than 500<br />

meters from a village. In fact there is <strong>of</strong>ten a very<br />

sharp <strong>in</strong>terface between primary forest and lands<br />

that have been converted for agricultural purposes<br />

for some time. This may not be the case however,<br />

for the impacts associated with hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> “bush<br />

meat” for personal use or for markets.<br />

Figure L: Contextual rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> karst forest<br />

If there were two or more disturbance types with<strong>in</strong> the 2 km buffer zone <strong>of</strong> a given target<br />

occurrence - these were ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method detailed <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!